Recently, I asked readers to take a survey so I could get better demographic information, perhaps attract a sponsor or two, and figure out what is working, what is not, and how I can improve the newsletter.

Let me start with the uncomfortable part: A lot of people said they want to support my work, but they do not want yet another subscription.

In fact, more than 60 percent of readers who answered that question said they would be somewhat or very likely to support the newsletter through a “Buy Me a Coffee” link.

So, without further ado, here’s such a link. (I’ll just start adding this to the block of links I have every day, I think):

Buy Me a Coffee

If you’re not familiar, this is a simple way to make a one-time contribution that you control. No subscription or recurring commitment unless you deliberately choose one.

Now, here are some of the other things I learned.

Who reads Understandably

We now have about 110,000 active subscribers.

That is down from the peak, but any newsletter list—especially one going on seven years old—eventually accumulates “zombies.” People stop opening, change email addresses, leave jobs, or simply disappear.

Honestly, I also have not done much to attract new subscribers lately.

On the day I sent the survey, the open rate was roughly 26 percent, or just under 30,000 individual readers. That is typical.

About 1,200 people clicked the survey link, and 889 completed it. Thank you!

As it turns out, our readers are basically me, extrapolated.

We skew a bit older and fairly financially established:

• About 93 percent of respondents were Gen X or older,

• Among those who disclosed income, more than half reported household income of at least $150,000.

The audience is almost evenly divided:

• 51 percent women
  48 percent men

About 35 percent are retired, which makes sense. The rest include substantial numbers of professionals, consultants, executives, educators, business owners, and founders.

Politically:

• 41 percent centrist or moderate

• 38 percent liberal or very liberal

• 22 percent conservative or very conservative

What you like

Understandably grew out of Inc. This Morning, which I launched and wrote for Inc. from 2018 to 2019.

When I made the switch to an independent publication, I more or less copied the format I had developed there: (a) a longer essay every day, followed by (b) “7 other things” worth knowing.

Seven years later, those two parts are essentially tied as the most popular things I do. Here is the percentage of readers who gave each feature four or five stars:

• “7 other things” — 86 percent

• Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday essays — 85 percent

• Big Optimism — 84 percent

• Free for ALL Fridays — 76 percent

• Comments and community — 55 percent

So “7 other things,” which began almost as an afterthought, is now technically the highest-rated feature in the newsletter.

Don’t mess this up!

The overall message from the open-ended answers was not complicated:

“We like the newsletter. Please do not mess it up!”

People said they like the mixture of personal stories, research, business, psychology, history, optimism, and links to things they might not otherwise encounter. Many specifically asked me to keep “7 other things.”

A lot of people said they appreciate that the newsletter is not consumed by politics. Others asked me to be careful to keep it that way.

Some said I could publish less often. A few said the essays run too long, I repeat myself, or I mention Life Story Magic too often.

I also asked whether people wanted more audio, video, podcasts, and live interviews.

The most popular answer: None of these!

The larger message was clear. Most of you still want to read.

What happens next

I am working on a clearer mission for Understandably. Here is a draft:

“Understandably exists to help people over 50 live healthier, more successful lives—and better understand the world around them.”

That is broad enough to include most of what I already write about, but specific enough to help me decide what belongs here on any given day.

I also need to be more deliberate about the business side.

Understandably takes a significant amount of time to produce. For years, other writing work subsidized it, and I mostly concentrated on getting the next issue out.

That works less well now. The world keeps evolving, and nearly every part of the media business has become harder. But then again, I always seem to figure it out.

I am not planning to put everything behind a paywall or turn every newsletter into a pledge drive. But I probably will pursue sponsorships, occasional books or guides, and other ways to make Understandably more sustainable.

Mostly, though, I am going to keep writing the newsletter.

That was the clearest thing the survey told me to do.

Subscribe now

Share

Buy Me a Coffee

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• NBC News: President Trump branded the Iranian regime “unbelievably duplicitous” on Monday, saying they asked for talks on ending the war, only to announce that no discussions would be held. Trump said the canceled attacks would have been “the biggest attack since World War II,” and that they could still take place “anytime we want.”

• WaPo: How rogue officers turned a nationwide camera network into a tool for stalking. Flock’s array of license-plate cameras was built to fight crime — but at least 50 law enforcement officers were charged with or accused of misusing it and other systems.

• NY Post: FIFA President Gianni Infantino wants the Trump administration to help keep him in office amid growing pressure to resign over his scheme to sell off the World Cup to Josh Kushner’s private equity firm, The Post has learned. Sources say that Infantino, 56, has repeatedly tried and failed to reach President Trump, 80, by phone since his plan to sell off the game’s commercial assets to private investors collapsed last week.

• NYT: After revelations that a botched renovation — not vandalism — had caused the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool’s recent problems, the U.S. attorney’s office has moved to dismiss several prosecutions brought against people accused of damaging it.

• WSJ: The struggling colleges raiding their endowments to pay the bills. It’s the last resort for institutions on the brink — tapping restricted funds from donors to keep the lights on. “The money they donated is not being used for what they gave it for.”

• CNBC: Why the U.S. stepped in after decades to prop up Japan’s yen — and what’s at stake.

• Hollywood Reporter: Spider-Man: Brand New Day brought in $360 million from North American screens last weekend, the biggest U.S. box office opening ever, leaping past Avengers: Endgame’s $357.1 million record from 2019. Its global weekend total stands at $932 million; Endgame still holds the worldwide record with $1.2 billion.

Correction/addition!

I messed up and didn’t actually include the YEARS of the anniversaries for the optimistic-in-retrospect events in the “7 other moments from history this week” in yesterday’s newsletter. So:

• The Tower Subway: Opened August 2, 1870.

• Mary Lou Retton gets her perfect score: August 3, 1984;

• John Peter Zenger wins his libel suit and establishes freedom of the press: August 4, 1734;

• Cyrus Field’s transatlantic telegraph: August 5, 1858;

• Gertrude Ederle swimming the English Channel and breaking the men’s record: August 6, 1926 (so 100 years!);

• George Washington establishing the Purple Heart: August 7, 1782; and,

• Wilbur Wright publicly demonstrating flight at Le Mans: August 8, 1908.

Subscribe now

Share

Buy Me a Coffee

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading—and for telling me about yourselves! See you in the comments.

Justin Dart Jr. entered the world in Chicago in 1930 with just about every material advantage a person could have.

His mother was an heir to the Walgreen fortune, the granddaughter of the man who founded the drugstore chain. His father built a plastics and consumer-products company that eventually became Dart Industries, the company behind Tupperware.

There were maids in the house and a chauffeur to drive the family around. Nothing about Dart’s early life pointed toward hardship, much less a lifetime spent fighting for people who had been pushed aside.

Then, at 18, just as he was preparing to attend the University of Houston, Dart contracted polio. He survived, but he lost the use of his legs and would use a wheelchair for the rest of his life.

Years later, Dart called the onset of polio “the beginning of my good days.” He believed the experience forced him to confront his feelings of inadequacy and gave him a larger sense of purpose.

During his recovery, he read Gandhi. The ideas stayed with him.

Dart went on to earn degrees in history and education at the University of Houston. But when graduation approached, the university refused to give him a teaching certificate. Its position was blunt: a man in a wheelchair could not succeed as a teacher.

So Dart joined the family business.

He spent years working in Asia and eventually took charge of Tupperware’s operations in Japan. While there, he promoted women and people with disabilities into jobs that carried genuine responsibility and authority.

Executives in the United States told him to stop. Dart and his wife, Yoshiko, resigned instead.

The decisive break with corporate life came in 1966. During a business trip that took him through Saigon, Dart visited what he had been told was a rehabilitation center for children with polio.

He found children lying on a concrete floor without adequate food or care, apparently abandoned and left to die. One dying girl reached out and held his hand. Dart later said the memory had been burned into his soul.

Not long afterward, he walked away from corporate life.

For roughly the next 20 years, often working without pay, Dart served on disability commissions in Texas and in Washington. Under President Ronald Reagan, he became vice chair of the National Council on Disability. Under President George H.W. Bush, he chaired the Congressional Task Force on the Rights and Empowerment of Americans with Disabilities.

That title sounds bureaucratic. The work was deeply personal.

Dart traveled to every state, along with Puerto Rico, Guam, and Washington, D.C. He held public meetings where people with disabilities could explain what discrimination looked like in their own homes, schools, workplaces, neighborhoods, and daily lives.

More than 30,000 people took part.

Their testimony, gathered community by community, created the record Congress would later rely on when considering a sweeping civil-rights law for Americans with disabilities.

Dart was hardly an outsider storming the gates. He was a wealthy Republican with connections to two presidents. He had access, influence, and a family name that opened doors.

He chose to use those advantages for people who had spent their lives being denied access to almost everything.

On July 26, 1990, President George H.W. Bush sat at a small desk on the South Lawn of the White House and signed the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Nearly 3,000 people were there.

On Bush’s right sat Evan Kemp, who had muscular dystrophy. On his left sat Dart, wearing his familiar cowboy hat and a blue-and-white button bearing the letters “ADA.”

The bill had passed the Senate by a vote of 91–6 and the House by 377–28.

With Bush’s signature, the United States became the first country to enact comprehensive civil-rights protections for people with disabilities. The law addressed employment, transportation, public accommodations, and telecommunications. More than three decades later, it remains one of the most consequential disability-rights laws ever passed.

Dart died in 2002 at the age of 71.

When he is remembered today, he is often called the father of the ADA. It was a title he reportedly resisted.

The law, he insisted, belonged to the tens of thousands of disabled Americans who had come forward, told the truth about their lives, and demanded to be treated as full citizens.

Share

Subscribe now

Leave a comment

7 other moments to know from history this week

• July 26: “It just dared me even more.” — Sharon Sites Adams, describing her response to the skeptics — including Los Angeles newspaper editorials predicting she’d cost taxpayers a fortune when someone had to go rescue her — before she set out alone from Yokohama, Japan, in May 1969 to sail across the Pacific Ocean. Seventy-four days, 17 hours, and 15 minutes later, she sighted the California coast.

• July 27: “Only God can know the sensation of this moment.” — A crew member aboard the SS Great Eastern, on this day in 1866, after the ship successfully completed the first permanent transatlantic telegraph cable, stretching 2,000 miles from Valentia Island, Ireland, to Heart’s Content, Newfoundland. Messages that had taken up to two weeks to cross the ocean by ship now took two minutes.

• July 28: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” — The opening line of Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment, officially certified as part of the U.S. Constitution on this day in 1868.

• July 29: “The Congress hereby declares that it is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.” — From the National Aeronautics and Space Act, signed into law by President Dwight D. Eisenhower on this day in 1958.

• July 30: “People want books... good books, and... they are willing, even anxious to buy them if they are presented in a straightforward, intelligent manner at a cheap price.” — Allen Lane, the British publisher who launched Penguin Books on this day in 1935 with ten paperback titles, each priced at sixpence — the cost of a pack of cigarettes. Within a year, Penguin had sold three million paperbacks in a country of 38 million people.

• July 31: “Too all to whom these Presents shall come, Greeting.” — The opening words of United States Patent No. 1, issued on this day in 1790 to Samuel Hopkins, a Philadelphia Quaker, for an improved method of manufacturing potash and pearl ash — industrial chemicals used in glassmaking, soapmaking, and gunpowder production.

• August 1: “I have discovered an air five or six times as good as common air.” — Joseph Priestley, an English chemist, describing the gas he isolated on this day in 1774 by focusing sunlight through a large magnifying lens onto a sample of mercuric oxide. Candles burned brighter in it and a mouse kept beneath a glass jar survived far longer than in ordinary air. The French chemist Antoine Lavoisier later identified what Priestley had discovered and gave the gas its name: oxygen.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

The World Cup is on, and I am one zillion percent into it — and of course it has me thinking about Aristotle.

As I wrote here a while back:

Aristotle argued that everything has a telos — a purpose — and that it achieves its “good” by fulfilling that purpose well. It applies to everything. A pen is better used to write something meaningful than to scrawl nonsense on a bathroom wall. A person with a natural gift for singing flourishes by developing that gift, not by ignoring it or trying to be something else.

You don’t get to your telos by becoming a slightly worse version of someone else. You get there by being a more complete version of yourself.

We recognize that instinctively. We admire it when we see it, even in areas we don’t normally care about.

For a lot of people, that probably describes the World Cup. It comes around once every four years, so for most players that means they get just a handful of chances, even to be in the show.

The World Cup also surfaces many players that even diehard soccer fans know almost nothing about — men from countries and corners of the game that rarely get a global stage.

But we watch them play and something clicks anyway, because we’re watching people doing exactly what they were built to do, on the one occasion that comes along rarely enough to matter completely.

Ergo, Aristotle.

With that in mind, here are a few of the most remarkable stories from this World Cup.

Some involve players born into genuinely brutal circumstances who were eventually recognized for their talent and developed into elite athletes. Others are simply about the roundabout, almost accidental way they ended up on the biggest athletic stage in the world.

Orlando Gill, Paraguay

First among equals: when Gill’s newborn son arrived with serious health complications, the goalkeeper sold most of his equipment and even the jersey he’d worn when he debuted for Paraguay’s Under-19 side to cover hospital bills and buy food. He kept only his goalkeeper gloves.

In the Round of 16 in Boston, wearing those same gloves, he saved two penalties in a shootout to knock out Germany. (Your humble newsletter author was in the stands.)

For Paraguay, a country that hasn’t been to a World Cup in 16 years, it was something like the 1980 Miracle on Ice — and the man who made it happen had been selling his kit on the internet four years ago to keep his family alive.

Alphonso Davies, Canada

Davies was born in a refugee camp in Ghana after his parents fled Liberia’s Second Civil War. The family lived in a hut not much larger than a minivan; at times they had to climb over corpses to find food.

They were resettled in Canada when Alphonso was five; he learned to play soccer first in Alberta in an after-school program for kids who couldn’t afford other leagues, called Free Footie.

At 17, Davies stood before 200 FIFA delegates and delivered a speech backing North America’s bid to host the 2026 World Cup. Eight years later, he walked onto the pitch as Canada’s captain in that same tournament.

Folarin Balogun, USA

In June 2001, Florence Balogun — a Nigerian citizen living in London — was seven months pregnant and visiting New York City. When she tried to fly home, she was denied boarding because of the advanced state of her pregnancy.

Her son Folarin was born in Brooklyn days later, making him an American citizen by birthright. The family returned to England within weeks.

Two decades later, the US men’s national team launched a sustained effort to persuade Balogun to play for the Americans rather than England or Nigeria. He has three goals in the tournament so far, including the game-winner against Bosnia — plus a controversial red card, but that’s a longer story.

Vozinha, Cape Verde

Vozinha turned professional at 25 and has spent the nearly two decades since bouncing between clubs in Moldova, Angola, Cyprus, Slovakia, and Portugal. He is 40 years old.

When Cape Verde — one of the smallest nations ever to qualify for a World Cup — faced Spain in their first-ever World Cup match last month, Vozinha stood in goal and faced 27 shots. He stopped all of them.

Then he walked off in tears — remembering the grandparents who raised him but who died before he got there, and thinking of his mother, who couldn’t get a visa to the United States in time and watched from home.

Roberto “Pico” Lopes, Cape Verde

Dublin-born defender Roberto Lopes discovered his international soccer future through a LinkedIn message in Portuguese that he assumed was spam and ignored for nine months.

When a follow-up arrived in English, he finally translated the original and learned that Cape Verde wanted him to represent the country of his father’s birth.

Lopes’s mother, Judy, works as a secretary at a primary school in Crumlin. She’d had to fly home to Dublin after the group stage because she needed to get back to work — until Aer Lingus found out and flew the whole family back to Florida for the Round of 16 against Argentina.

Antonio Rüdiger, Germany

During his family’s escape from the civil war in Sierra Leone, Rüdiger’s uncle hid the children in sacks of rice to prevent them from being taken by armed groups.

His mother eventually settled in Berlin’s Neukölln district and raised him there.

Rüdiger is a starting defender for Real Madrid and was one of the most important players in Germany’s squad — past tense because they lost to Paraguay; I was there for that too. He runs a foundation in Sierra Leone focused on education, sport, and healthcare.

Eduardo Camavinga, France

Camavinga was born in a refugee camp in Angola after his parents fled the war in DR Congo. The family made it to France, where he grew up, broke into professional football as a teenager at Rennes, and is now a Champions League winner with Real Madrid.

He and Rüdiger are teammates at club level and both arrived at this World Cup from refugee backgrounds — two of the most decorated players in the world’s most decorated club, with that in common.

Raphinha, Brazil

Raphinha grew up in Restinga, a favela in Porto Alegre. As a teenager he often went eight or nine hours without eating, with only enough money for bus fare home.

He has said that many of his childhood friends were better footballers than he was — faster, more technically gifted — but they were lost to poverty, crime, and drug trafficking.

Raphinha arrived at this World Cup having just led Barcelona to a domestic treble, arguably the best player on earth right now. He knows exactly what it cost just to get here, and it wasn’t only talent.

Awer Mabil, Australia

Mabil’s parents fled South Sudan for Kenya during the civil war. He was born in Kakuma refugee camp. His first football was a rolled-up sock. He played barefoot on dirt. Eventually the family emigrated to Australia.

He went on to score the penalty that sent Australia to the 2022 World Cup, which he described as “the only way to say thank you to Australia on behalf of my family.”

He has since co-founded Barefoot to Boots, a charity that sends football gear to children still living in Kakuma — so they don’t have to play with a sock.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• CNN: President Trump beamed with excitement as he boarded his new $400 million Air Force One, a luxury jet gifted by the government of Qatar.

• People: Trump also memorialized Village People lead singer Victor Willis, who died this week at age 75: “He was a great and happy guy who loved that I used … ‘YMCA,’ at my Rallies. … The crowds were, and are, enormous ...”

• CBS: Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce will be celebrating their nuptials with about 1,000 guests this holiday weekend in New York City after days of speculation about the most anticipated celebrity wedding of the year. The couple plans to start with a rehearsal dinner Thursday evening and a wedding celebration Friday into the early hours of Saturday morning at Madison Square Garden.

• Yahoo Finance: Rhode Island’s new tax on second homes is nicknamed for its most famous part-time resident, Taylor Swift, but the levy will also squeeze owners of saltbox houses on the coast far less grand than the singer’s Holiday House mansion. Under the annual property tax measure taking effect this week, the state will collect $5 for every $1,000 that a vacation home’s value is assessed over $1 million.

• CNBC: PlayStation will end physical disc production for all new games released on its consoles starting January 2028, the company announced Wednesday. New games will be sold either through the PlayStation Store or through retailers in digital formats only.

• NBC News: Ocean surface temperatures hit a record high in June, European scientists warned Wednesday, fueling fears of more dangerous heat waves this summer and deepening concerns over the global climate crisis.

• CNN: Alligators injured three people, one fatally, in a string of separate attacks across Florida over the weekend — the highest concentration of attacks in a single 72-hour period since state records began.

  ---

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. See you in the comments.

I’ve cut way back on social media over the last few years — largely because most of my real-life friends have too. Blame the algorithms, blame the business model, blame whatever you want.

But on the comparatively few occasions I do use it, here’s what I’ve noticed about my own behavior:

• I exchange tips and news with neighbors in my town’s unofficial local groups.

• I trade ideas and experiences about skiing in the Northeast with other like-minded folks.

• I talk about soccer — and especially the U.S. Men’s National Team — with other long-suffering fans.

In almost all of these cases, the people I’ve sorta/kinda gotten to know exist to me only as usernames. Whether we’re talking about PAskiguy415 on Reddit or Jane Smith on the local town Facebook group, I have an inch-wide, quarter-mile-deep view into their lives.

But we don’t actually know each other in real life.

Now, a new study from Oregon State University just addressed the underlying core questions these kinds of relationships pose:

• Do online-only connections count?

• Can these virtual relationships do for us what real-life relationships do?

Sorry PAskiguy415. The short answer, apparently, is no.

In fact, for some people, they may make things worse.

Idealization of friendships

Published in Public Health Reports, the official journal of the U.S. Public Health Service, the study surveyed 1,514 U.S. adults between the ages of 30 and 70 in a nationally representative sample.

Researchers divided each person’s social media connections into two groups: people they had met in person, and people they hadn’t.

Adults with higher percentages of online-only connections (people they’d never actually met face-to-face) reported greater loneliness.

Moreover, connecting online with people you actually know didn’t help either. It was associated with neither greater loneliness, but it also wasn’t associated with less loneliness.

Study co-author Jessica Gorman explained the mechanism:

“We know that social media interactions can result in idealization of other people’s friendships with each other, which can exacerbate the effects of social comparison.

This idealization is possibly stronger when those friendships involve people you’ve never met because there is no personal experience to counter that idealization.”

In other words: when you interact with someone online you’ve never met, you fill in the gaps—usually with something rosier than reality.

You don’t see the bad days and the friction that comes with actually knowing someone. The comparison makes you feel worse about your own social life, not better.

‘Happier and healthier. Period.’

None of this would surprise Robert Waldinger, the Harvard psychiatrist who has been running the 88-year Harvard Grant Study of adult development since 2003.

His summary of what decades of data show: “Good relationships keep us happier and healthier. Period.”

But, this new study suggests that relationships only matter when people build them on actual shared experiences.

It’s apparently about time in the same room, attention paid in real time — the good, the bad, and the ugly that comes along with getting to know almost anyone in three dimensions.

Quick caveats:

• The study predates the current wave of AI-powered social tools (summer 2023).

• It’s a snapshot, not a longitudinal tracking of the same people over time.

• And, we have our old friend correlation versus causation to consider: Lonelier people may be more likely to seek online connections with strangers to begin with, rather than those connections causing the loneliness.

Most probably, said lead author Brian Primack, it runs in both directions.

People experiencing loneliness “may wish to examine critically their interactions with strangers on social media and to prioritize in-person connections over social media ones, even when those social media connections are considered close.”

All of which leads me to: If you see a middle-aged guy in a throwback 1994 denim soccer jersey going a little bit crazy for the U.S. men’s national team against Bosnia today, say hello.

It might just be CaligiurisLeftFoot from your online group.

And you’d both probably like to meet in real-life.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• USA Today: Supreme Court season ended Tuesday as the court rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to redefine who is an American, striking down his efforts to limit on birthright citizenship. The 6-3 ruling landed after the justices backed the president in other cases, including last week’s ruling allowing Trump to end deportation protections for hundreds of thousands of immigrants.

• Bloomberg: The death toll from last week's twin earthquakes in Venezuela rose to nearly 2,000 on Tuesday, with tens of thousands still missing. Opposition leader Maria Corina Machado, who has been in exile, said she was stranded in Panama after authorities refused to allow her flight to land in Caracas.

• Reuters: Happy Canada Day! The Trump administration is expected to formally declare ​on Wednesday that it will not extend the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on trade, starting a decade-long clock to wind down the 32-year-old North American free trade zone. That declaration kicks off a six-year review session, part of a “sunset clause” negotiated by President Donald Trump’s first administration.

• 24WallSt, CNBC: Trump’s personal fortune has nearly tripled since he left the White House in 2021, up to $6.5 billion form $2.4 billion when he left the White House in 2021. Latest jump: about $515 million from the sale of tokens released by the firm World Liberty Financial, the Trump-linked crypto company co-founded by members of his family.

• CNBC: Smaller but interesting: Trump purchased between $1 million and $5 million in shares of Axon Enterprise — maker of Tasers, body cameras, and policing software — on February 10, just two weeks before ICE posted a notice seeking a five-year, $220 million contract for nearly 18,000 new Tasers. Procurement experts told CNBC that the contract specifications appear to match only Axon’s TASER 10 model.

• AP: Scientists have stumbled on a rare dinosaur fossil from Antarctica, tucked away for decades in a drawer. The bone comes from the tail of a long-necked, plant-eating dinosaur called a titanosaur. Scientists haven’t yet identified the species it belongs to. It was discovered in 1985.

  ---

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

Today’s post is a low power mode edition, and I remembered it just in the nick of time.

It’s largely about Washington, DC. I lived there in two stints: from 1998 to 2001, and then 2004 to 2012. Overall, I have good memories.

At just under 700,000 people, it’s a medium sized city, a bit smaller than Nashville or Boston. Compare that to 8.4 million in New York or 2.3 million in Houston.

But because it’s the seat of government, it punches far above its weight: universities, museums, restaurants, concerts, bars, sports, embassies.

People come and go constantly, from all over the world. Sure, many are obsessed with work, but it’s a beautiful place in its own way, and I have to say I was never bored.

Plus, as someone told me on my first weekend there in 1998: There’s always at least one February day in DC that’s warm enough to wear shorts.

That turned out to be prophetic and true.

Of my thousands of “Bill when he lived in DC” stories, I’d like to share a surreal vignette. It was brief and beautiful, and it took place almost 15 years ago: Sunday July 17, 2011, a little before 5 a.m.

I know the date because I posted about it on Facebook afterward.

At the time, I was living alone in Southwest DC. Recently divorced (no kids, long story, maybe we’ll get into that some other time).

I couldn’t sleep, so I got out of bed in the very early morning hours, grabbed some not-exactly-clean workout clothes from the hamper, and went for a run.

This will be relevant in a second: I was wearing a shirt leftover from my army days that that had “10th Mountain Division” and “USA” in big letters on the front.

Anyway, I did 6.6 miles on a whim before sunrise that day (I recorded it on MapMyRun): no big deal for me then, but a number that impresses the older version of me today.

Still, I remember that running in DC is amazing.

• I left my apartment in SW …

• Headed north to the Mall to the Washington Monument …

• Then nearly a mile west to the Lincoln Memorial.

• I ran up and down the steps of the Lincoln like I always did, turned past the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, back to the Washington, through the Ellipse, around the White House, and back home.

Something happened in the middle, at the Washington Monument. It’s a really beautiful place if you haven’t been there: a 554 foot tall white tower, surrounded by flags, halfway between the Capitol and the Lincoln.

I’ll quote myself, nearly a decade and a half ago:

Total insomnia so I went for a run at 4:45 a.m. (75F-perfect!) It’s amazing who’s out in DC at that time.

My favorite encounter was two girls apparently still wrapping up last night’s party. [We crossed paths] at the Washington Monument.

One of them pointed to my USA t-shirt and the 56 US flags surrounding the monument and exclaimed with apparent sincerity,

“Don’t you just... LOVE America?!!”

I remember these young women, especially the “LOVE America” one. (Actually more to the point, I don’t really remember them, but I remember writing about them, and I trust my memory then.)

They were both very pretty, Black, way more stylishly dressed and hip than I have ever remotely been in my entire life.

This was my kind of “Bill getting his confidence back after divorce” stage, and I felt pretty cool that they were even talking to me.

I thought a lot about the encounter for hours and days later—I mean, I wasn’t in the habit of posting about every run to Facebook and mapping it out, but I did.

Here I am, all this time later, thinking about it.

It’s just this small, hopeful memory that I hope I can hold onto forever. I suppose it could have been anywhere, but it’s poignant for me that it was there in DC — especially now, just a few days before the 250th birthday.

It’s the idea that you can bump into a stranger, middle of the night, strangest possible place—and you can choose to be positive, choose to focus on whatever small things you have in common, choose to make a connection.

For that matter, as hard as it might be sometimes, you can choose to profess your shared love for this messy, frustrating, beautiful country of ours—and hopefully commit to work hard, and get it on track to stay worthy.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• NPR: The Supreme Court’s conservative majority took a sledgehammer to much of the federal government’s regulatory structure Monday, striking down almost all the limits that Congress—and the courts—had previously established to protect the independence of regulatory agencies that make up roughly a third of the federal government. The court’s decision reversed a 90-year-old precedent. In a Truth Social post, President Trump called the decision a “BIG WIN,” one of the most important rulings “ever given with respect to Presidential Powers.”

• AP: Roughly 146 people including 19 women and seven children who the U.S. deported to Venezuela last week are missing after the Caracas hotel in which they were staying was reduced to rubble after a series of earthquakes, setting off a scramble to find survivors and bodies.

• NYT, Daily Mail: The Court also declined a request by Trump to review a $5 million civil judgment against him after a jury found in 2023 that he sexually abused and defamed the writer E. Jean Carroll. Trump launched into a furious tirade against Carroll afterward. Carroll also sued Trump in a separate 2019 defamation case that resulted in an $83.3 million jury verdict. That figure has since grown to over $100 million with accrued interest.

• AP, Fox News: New Gallup polling finds that 53% of U.S. adults are “extremely” or “very” proud to be an American, the lowest reading in the trend dating back to 2001. A separate Fox News poll had more disappointing numbers, finding that fewer than half of U.S. voters say America has made meaningful progress on ideals as liberty, equality, and self-reliance.

• Bloomberg: Ford Motor Co. took an unusually human approach to fixing its stubborn quality problems: It brought back what it calls “gray beard” engineers to help train younger staff and to reprogram the artificial intelligence tools that weren’t getting the job done. Over the last three years, Ford says it has hired 350 veteran engineers, many of them former employees and others from suppliers, to help address seemingly intractable quality woes that have cost the automaker billions.

• USA Today: One more Supreme Court story: the Court ruled Mississippi can count late-arriving mail-in ballots, upholding a state law allowing ballots cast by Election Day to be counted if they’re received within five days. Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts joined the court’s three liberal justices in backing the law.

• AP: Joseph McGrail-Bateup, an Australian professional air conditioner cleaner and honorary town crier, has been recognized as the world’s loudest person. Guinness World Records acknowledged the 58-year-old Canberra resident recorded the loudest ever shout by an individual. He yelled “now” at 122.4 decibels. That broke the previous record of 121.7 dB set by Northern Ireland schoolteacher Annalisa Flanagan in 1994.

  ---

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. See you in the comments.

The other day, I looked at the cars in our driveway and did some quick math.

My wife drives a 2015 Honda CR-V. I drive a 2014 Ford Explorer. Between the two of us, we’re sitting on 23 years of car.

No car payments, no dealership negotiations—and no particular hurry to change that.

Now, a new report suggests we’re trendier than we imagined.

According to the Wall Street Journal, roughly one million prospective customers have simply left the new car market since 2020. By most industry projections, they’re not coming back anytime soon.

Americans were buying around 17 million cars and trucks last decade; analysts now expect something closer to 16 million this year.

Often overlooked but worth noting: the United States also has between 22 and 26 million more residents now than it did back in 2016.

The average new car now runs $50,000. The average age of cars on U.S. roads is 13 years old, a historic high. So our Honda fits right in, and our Ford isn’t far off, either.

“I don’t want to say automakers are OK with this level of sales,” Ivan Drury of Edmunds told the Journal. “But they kind of are.”

The reason: Selling fewer trucks and SUVs at $50,000-plus is more profitable than selling more of yesterday’s cheaper cars.

About a million buyers seem unimpressed by their math.

One frustrated car shopper quoted in the Journal described walking away in sticker shock. Rather than buy new, he concluded he’d “do what everybody else is doing and just hold on to my vehicle as long as I can.”

Granted, our situation might be different if either my wife or I had any kind of commute to speak of. But, we don’t.

We live somewhere with good public transit into the city, Uber covers almost everything else. For airport runs, rideshare is usually faster and comparable in cost to parking.

I bought the Explorer on a whim after one too many days when we both needed a car at the same time.

The Explorer (used) solved that — and, importantly, I could buy it for cash.

As for the Honda, we bought it when my daughter was little. We didn’t have much time to shop, and it came down to the Honda and a couple of other options.

I spent a day counting how many old Hondas, Toyotas, Mazdas, and other makes I saw still on the road.

Let’s not over-complicate this, I thought; just do what everybody else is doing.

Why haven’t we bought a new car since Barack Obama was president? I’d turn my rhetorical question around and ask: Why would we?

Even as the odometers reach six figures, they’re paid off, they require lower insurance payments than newer cars, and they’re in good shape (knock on wood, that’s all I need is to jinx myself).

Sure, they have a few scratches here and there, but that’s a feature, not a bug — you stop caring when someone dings you in a parking lot.

I have zero concern about, for example, leaving it in the garage at MetroPark for probably 12 or 14 hours next week, when I take Amtrak down to Philadelphia for a World Cup game. Come to think about it, the ticket cost me roughly what a car payment likely would, if I had a car payment.

The Ford is particularly good at the things I actually use a car for: long family road trips, ski weekends, hauling gear.

Also, a middle-aged guy can daydream about someday taking a multi-day ski trip camping out of the back of it, even if that probably won’t happen.

Nothing about a $60,000 vehicle with built-in subscriptions, over-the-air updates, and AI-era data collection apparatuses running in the background makes me want to trade up to that.

Also completely absent: any social pressure to do otherwise.

There was a time — I think this was a real thing, not a myth — when people thought the car in your driveway might have said something about where you’d arrived in life. That feeling seems largely gone, at least in my experience.

Nobody is looking at a 2014 Explorer and drawing conclusions.

If they are, I’m happily oblivious — and that’s probably the better deal anyway.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• WSJ Editorial Board: Trump Stages an Iran Retreat: The regime gets financial relief to reopen Hormuz and hold more nuclear talks. “Iran’s new leaders are likely to conclude that Mr. Trump has no desire for more conflict, and they will negotiate accordingly. Congress should scrutinize any final agreement Mr. Trump makes with Iran—and reject it if it props up a regime that still says ‘death to America.’”

• NPR: Britain will ban children under 16 from social media platforms including Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and X, following Australia's lead as the first country to impose such a ban. Messaging apps like WhatsApp and Signal will not be affected.

• CBS News: The FBI disrupted a plot to attack Sunday’s UFC fight night at the White House with explosives-laden drones and gunfire, according to court papers unsealed Tuesday. A 19-year-old Ohio man named in the affidavit, Tycen Proper, allegedly told investigators he intended to “jump-start” a revolution.

• MSNBC: Secret Service officials are angry that FBI Director Kash Patel jumped the gun by publicly announcing the case Tuesday on Twitter (née X) before all suspects were in custody, according to three people familiar with the matter.

• NPR: G7 leaders pushed Tuesday to bring the war in Ukraine back to the top of Trump's agenda at the summit in France, after months in which the Iran conflict overshadowed it. Hours before the summit opened, Russia fired hundreds of drones and dozens of missiles at Ukrainian cities, killing 11 people.

• Democracy Now!: A Ukrainian drone strike set Russia's Moscow oil refinery ablaze Tuesday — a facility that normally supplies nearly half the fuel used in Russia's capital. The attack came one day after Ukraine officially began EU accession negotiations in Luxembourg, a process unlocked after Hungary's new government lifted its longstanding veto on Ukraine's membership bid.

• NPR: South African jazz pianist Abdullah Ibrahim, whose 1974 song "Mannenberg" became an anti-apartheid anthem that reportedly inspired Nelson Mandela during his imprisonment, has died at 91. Ibrahim performed at Mandela's 1994 inauguration; Mandela reportedly called him "our Mozart."

  ---

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. I wrote about some of this at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

Earlier this week, I wrote about a major new study linking GLP-1 drugs to significant reductions in depression, anxiety, and substance use disorders — and I mentioned that I’ve been taking one myself for about a year and a half.

It worked. Honestly, this might be the first time I’ve offered a before-and-after photo in this newsletter. And the drug wasn’t the only thing I did; I now spend a lot of time in the gym, and my diet is much better.

But if you haven’t enabled images, the photo above is the difference between me in November 2024 at the nadir, fighting physics to finish a 5K with my daughter, and last weekend, when it was—well let’s just say a lot closer to my long-ago marathoning days.

All of which leads me to a separate study that came out last month, because it got my Irish up.

Researchers at Rice University, publishing in the International Journal of Obesity, studied how people perceive those who lose weight using GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic or Wegovy.

Their finding: people who lose weight on these medications face more social stigma than people who lose the same weight through diet and exercise. In some cases, more than people who don’t lose weight at all. The explanation the researchers point to: a widespread perception that GLP-1 drugs are “the easy way out.”

I have thoughts.

Thank you for the compliment

Allow me to offer a metaphor.

I have a full head of thick hair in my mid-50s, and I didn’t do anything to earn it — genetics, luck, whatever.

But I also don’t have strong feelings about men who are losing their hair. I’m glad they’re trying to explore medical options to address it.

Rogaine exists. Finasteride exists. People make their own choices about their own bodies, and I genuinely couldn’t care less what those choices are.

See what I mean?

The idea that someone who is biologically predisposed to carry more weight should be judged more harshly for using a medical tool to address it than for simply staying overweight strikes me as really weird.

I wouldn’t hesitate to tell you I took a drug for high blood pressure or high cholesterol.

I’d tell you about a knee surgery or a course of antibiotics.

I don’t get why a medication that happens to affect weight and metabolism would be treated differently — or why losing weight with its help would make someone more of a target for judgment than not losing weight at all.

‘The easy way out’

The Rice researchers ran a series of experiments in which participants evaluated people who had lost weight via GLP-1 drugs, via diet and exercise, or not at all.

Across the board, GLP-1 users were rated more negatively.

The stigma compounds if someone stops the medication and regains weight — which is common, because these drugs work while you take them, and stopping them often reverses the effects.

In that scenario, the researchers found, the judgment gets even harsher.

“There’s a narrative that using these medications is ‘taking the easy way out,’” said lead researcher Erin Standen. “And that belief seems to shape how people are judged.”

Caveats: this is experimental research using study participants rating hypothetical scenarios, not a longitudinal study of real-world social outcomes.

You do you

The researchers flag something practical: Stigma around these drugs may be contributing to the spread of misinformation about their risks.

If people are motivated to believe GLP-1 users are doing something wrong, they may be more receptive to exaggerated claims about side effects.

There’s also a more direct consequence.

If someone is on the fence about a medication that a growing body of research suggests can meaningfully improve physical and mental health — and they’re hesitating partly because of what other people might think — that’s a real cost.

I told my doctor when she first prescribed the drug that even without insurance coverage I’d consider paying out of pocket, because I felt like I was buying myself extra years of healthy life expectancy.

She said she wished everyone had that attitude. Heck, I think she was about to hug me, except for things like propriety, and patient-doctor relationships and all of that.

But we hugged in spirit.

As always — or at least as often — I’m not telling anyone what to do.

Using these drugs is a personal decision that involves doctors, insurance, individual health histories, and a lot of factors I’m not qualified to weigh in on.

But if you’ve been thinking about it and the “easy way out” framing has been any part of what’s holding you back — I’d encourage you to set that aside.

The people making that judgment probably haven’t thought very hard about what it actually means.

See you at the gym and the ski slopes, I hope.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• ABC News — The House of Representatives on Wednesday adopted a resolution to curb President Donald Trump's Iran war powers by a vote of 215-208 — delivering a major rebuke to the administration's handling of the three-month-old conflict for the first time.

• ABC7 — California primary results: Republican Steve Hilton leads the governor's race with 28%, and Democrat Xavier Becerra is in second with 25%, with Tom Steyer in third at 20% — meaning Hilton and Becerra appear headed to November's general election. Hilton said he "received a message of congratulations" from Trump.

• CBS News — CBS News has fired longtime 60 Minutes correspondent and former CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley one day after he had a tense and confrontational exchange with new 60 Minutes executive producer Nick Bilton.

• NBC News — Progressive politicians are sharpening their attacks against tech tycoon Elon Musk, zeroing in on his soon-to-be-trillionaire status days before his company SpaceX’s record-setting initial public offering. Musk will likely become the world’s first trillionaire shortly as soon as next Friday, June 12.

• Bloomberg — SpaceX’s IPO will also likely make President Donald Trump’s already wealthy administration even richer. Ten officials ranging from special envoy Steve Witkoff to Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler reported financial interests in Elon Musk’s rocket company between $9.9 million and as much as $43.8 million, according to the latest disclosures.

• New York Times — The Sun Is Shining on Lisbon: The Portuguese capital is booming with an influx of artists, retirees and visitors drawn to an exciting, affordable culinary scene and an inclusive culture.

• National Geographic — Ten Reasons to Climb Kilimanjaro: Why do 40,000 people a year seek to climb the world’s highest freestanding mountain — a mountain so popular it has become known as “Everyman’s Everest”? Here are the top ten reasons, from the most practical to the most profound.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. I wrote about some of this at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

In May 1999, I was sitting in the Wang Theatre in Boston watching my sister graduate from Emerson College. Ted Leonsis was the commencement speaker. At that moment, he was a top early executive at AOL and the new owner of the Washington Capitals and Wizards.

Leonsis had one word for the graduating class: “internet.” He said it repeatedly, riffing on the famous “plastics” scene from The Graduate:

• Want to start a business? “I’ve got a word for you: internet.”

• Want to be an artist or a writer or a musician? “internet.”

• Want to find meaning and purpose and change people’s lives? “I have just one word for you: internet.”

He talked about e-commerce and music being downloaded rather than pressed onto CDs. Also, he introduced the concept of “viral marketing” before most people in the room had heard the term.

As best I can remember it, the response was mostly polite but a lot of it didn’t really land. There were definitely some jeers.

I was a few years older than most of the graduates, already dabbling in early internet projects on the side while working a full-time day job. I remember thinking, “This guy is spinning gold, and I don’t think the people around me feel it.”

“No disrespect …”

When Leonsis finished, the other honorary degree recipients took their turns.

Alice Hoffman, the novelist, kept it brief but got a massive applause line: “I mean, no disrespect to the internet, but I’m here to speak very briefly on behalf of books.”

Morley Safer of CBS News went further, gesturing directly back at Leonsis on the stage behind him:

I caution you, in spite of what the maestro here said, do not let technology become your master.

Do not be seduced by the siren song of information on call. Much of it is bogus.
For all of its billions of facts on file, it can also be a dank and dark breeding ground for the vicious and mean spirited. It is the new home of the big lie.

Big applause.

Leonsis had a sense of humor. As he returned to the podium to receive his honorary degree, he took the microphone for one last coda: “I’d like to thank the Friars for hosting this roast.”

Flash forward

Why bring up this 27-year-old commencement speech? Three reasons:

• Last month, at the University of Central Florida, a real estate executive named Gloria Caulfield told a room full of arts and humanities graduates that the rise of artificial intelligence is “the next industrial revolution.” The crowd erupted in boos. Someone yelled, “AI sucks!” She turned to the other speakers onstage: “What happened? OK, I struck a chord.”

• A week later, at the University of Arizona, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was booed multiple times while discussing AI — booing that began, by some accounts, before he even reached the lectern. He tried to acknowledge the crowd’s anxiety directly: “There is a fear in your generation that the future has already been written, that the machines are coming, and that the jobs are evaporating.” They booed that, too.

• At Emory University, Delta CEO Ed Bastian told graduates he had tried using AI to write his commencement address, and it was quick and easy, but it lacked soul and warmth — so he threw it out and rewrote it with pencil and paper. “You want to hear from me,” he told the graduates to applause, “not some algorithm of me.”

Right, but also right

This is not an article where I’m going to say that the example from 1999 proves AI is the future and anyone who objects is a Luddite who will be left behind.

I mean, Leonsis was clearly right, but Safer was mostly on target too.

The internet has created zillions of jobs, revolutionized industries, and changed the world. It has also become a breeding ground for the vicious and mean-spirited.

History doesn’t repeat itself, but it rhymes. If I were sitting in one of those red robes right now, I think I’d be paying very close attention to AI — with both enthusiasm and caution.

I’d hope my attitude would be one of skepticism, but not cynicism, which, come to think of it, is what I learned during my own college education from the Jesuits.

But that’s another graduation. I wrote about that one here.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• CNBC: The Department of Justice has permanently abandoned plans for a $1.8 billion fund created to settle a lawsuit by President Donald Trump against the IRS, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who was previously Trump’s criminal defense attorney, testified Tuesday. But the other part of the settlement — protecting Trump, his family members, and related business entities remain protected from any tax audits and enforcement actions — remains in effect.

• NPR — A divided D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the Trump administration's transgender military ban is unconstitutional, finding the policy was rooted in animus toward a politically unpopular group rather than military necessity. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s reply: "See you at SCOTUS."

• TechCrunch — Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, filed confidentially with the SEC for an IPO, jumping ahead of rival OpenAI in what is shaping up to be a landmark public market debut. The filing comes days after a $65 billion Series H pushed Anthropic's valuation to roughly $965 billion.

• CNBC, Washington Post — President Trump tapped Bill Pulte, who leads the Federal Housing Finance Agency and who has served as an attack dog against Trump’s foes, to serve as acting director of national intelligence. Pulte has no known prior intelligence experience. Separately: a pardoned Jan. 6 rioter, Elias Irizarry, has been hired to work inside a Pentagon office that manages highly classified military operations.

• Bloomberg — More than 1,000 current and former SpaceX employees have banded together to negotiate with wealth management firms for better pricing and access to sophisticated tax-saving financial products ahead of an IPO that is set to turn many of them into multi-millionaires. Employees in line for IPO windfalls typically seek out their own wealth advisers. The SpaceX group’s push for a kind of collective bargaining has the potential to create a new playbook for startup employees.

• NPR — Former New York congressman George Santos is being investigated over his trading activity on the prediction market site Kalshi. In February, four months after being released from federal prison, Santos posted a video to X saying he would attend Trump's State of the Union address — sending odds on Kalshi soaring. But he didn't show up. What Santos didn't say was that he had already placed bets on Kalshi that he was not going to appear, and made tens of thousands of dollars as a result.

• The Guardian — ‘Like a Klingon prison’: inside Barack Obama’s audacious, near-windowless, $850m presidential library.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. I wrote about some of this at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

I’ve written here before about my long and occasionally expensive relationship with my dermatologist — the product, I’m pretty sure, of Irish ancestry combined with years of swim team and summers spent lifeguarding as a kid.

In fact, I have an appointment with him today. These days I’m pretty religious about sunscreen, which he strongly endorses. Apparently, there’s a catch that I think a lot of people might have missed.

It’s that vitamin D — sometimes called the sunshine vitamin because your body produces it when your skin is exposed to sunlight — is one nutrient that my otherwise sensible SPF habits might be denying me.

Block enough sun, and you may also be limiting how much vitamin D your body makes naturally. You can get some from food — fatty fish, egg yolks, and fortified milk. It’s also in most standard multivitamins.

However, sun exposure is the primary natural source for most people, which means those of us slathering on SPF 50 every morning may be quietly running low without knowing it.

Recently, i came across a new study that made me think about vitamin D levels in a way I honestly never had before.

Poetic justice?

Researchers at the University of Galway followed 793 adults with an average age of 39 — none of whom had dementia — and measured their vitamin D levels at the start of the study.

About 16 years later, the same participants underwent brain scans measuring tau protein and amyloid beta, both of which are biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease.

The study, published in Neurology Open Access, found that those with higher vitamin D levels in midlife had measurably lower tau buildup in brain regions known to be affected earliest in Alzheimer’s, specifically areas tied to memory formation.

The association held up after controlling for age, sex, depression, and other health factors.

“These results suggest that higher vitamin D levels in midlife may offer protection against developing these tau deposits in the brain,” said lead author Martin David Mulligan, “and that low vitamin D levels could potentially be a risk factor that could be modified and treated to reduce the risk of dementia.”

Ironically, the University of Galway is in Ireland, which, given that I’m blaming my Irish ancestry for my dermatologist bills in the first place, feels like a certain kind of poetic justice.

16 years later

The vitamin D measurements were taken when participants were around 39 years old, and the brain scans came 16 years later.

Whatever was happening in those people’s bodies during middle age — the sunscreen habits, the time spent outdoors, whether they thought to take a supplement or whether their multivitamin was doing enough work — showed up in their brains a decade and a half down the road.

Mulligan made the point explicitly: Midlife is when risk factor modification can have the greatest impact on long-term brain health. It’s not in your 70s, when damage may already be accumulating.

The good news is that something as simple as a routine blood test — the kind your doctor can order at your next physical — could tell you whether you’re in the 34 percent with low levels.

If you are, it’s a relatively easy thing to address. A supplement, a multivitamin with adequate D, a conversation with your doctor about the right amount for your situation.

A nudge

The researchers are careful, and you should be too. This is observational research — vitamin D was measured only once, not tracked over time, so there’s no way to know whether levels fluctuated over those 16 years.

Also, the study shows an association, not proof that vitamin D directly prevents Alzheimer’s.

Bottom line: Get your levels checked. Find out where you stand. If you’re low, talk to your doctor about whether it makes sense to do something about it.

Given the alternative — finding out 16 years from now that you probably should have — it all seems like a manageable ask.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• AP: The Trump administration told Congress it plans to admit up to 17,500 white South Africans as refugees through September, up from an earlier cap of 7,500, citing what it called an "emergency refugee situation." Virtually all refugees admitted to the U.S. over the past six months have been from South Africa, even as millions of people displaced by other conflicts remain excluded.

• NBC News: Trump endorsed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over sitting Sen. John Cornyn ahead of next week's Texas Senate runoff — the latest in a series of moves by the president to reshape the Republican Party in his image.

• France 24: Iranian authorities held mass public weddings in Tehran Monday for couples who signed up to a state-sponsored scheme declaring their readiness to sacrifice their lives in the war against the US and Israel.

• CNN: The Long Island Rail Road strike — the first in more than 30 years on North America’s largest commuter rail system — ended Monday night after three days, with trains resuming at noon Tuesday.

• Reuters: SpaceX is planning to price its IPO as early as June 11 and begin trading on Nasdaq under the ticker SPCX as early as June 12, according to sources familiar with the matter. The company is targeting a valuation of roughly $1.75 trillion and aims to raise approximately $75 billion — which would make it the largest initial public offering in history, nearly double Saudi Aramco’s record.

• NPR: More than a quarter of private colleges — 442 of the nation’s 1,700 private, nonprofit four-year schools, with a combined 670,000 students — are at risk of closing or merging within the next ten years, according to a new analysis. Federal funding cuts, demographic shifts, and declining enrollment are all contributing factors.

• CBS News: Researchers analyzing blood samples from 85 sharks near a remote island in the Bahamas found that about one in three tested positive for caffeine, cocaine, or painkillers. Caffeine was the most common hit — and the first time it has ever been detected in sharks anywhere. “While the detection of cocaine tends to draw immediate attention,” one researcher said, “the widespread presence of caffeine and pharmaceuticals is equally alarming.”

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. I wrote about some of this at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

In the 1970s, a Harvard researcher named Frank Speizer was trying to understand the long-term effects of oral contraceptives. So, he did what a health researcher would do in those days. He asked male doctors to have their wives answer questions about their health.

Immediate problem: many doctors just filled out the forms on their wives’ behalf.

So Speizer and his team tried to think of how they could find a massive audience of women who were medically literate, conscientious, and willing to participate.

Um, hello? replied the entire U.S. nursing profession, metaphorically speaking.

The result: Speizer’s team sent letters to more than 170,000 women nurses in 1976, and 121,700 of them — more than 70% — agreed to answer questions about their health every two years for the rest of their lives.

The result has been one of the most important and productive research programs in the history of public health.

The study that keeps giving

The study is now run by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, with continuous funding from the National Institutes of Health.

A companion study enrolling more than 51,000 men was added in 1986, and some of the findings below draw on that combined dataset.

But the nurses came first. Without their participation, none of it exists. Here’s part of what their 50 years of data tells us: seven simple habits for a longer life.

1. Don’t smoke.

This one has never changed. A 2018 analysis of the combined dataset found that non-smokers lived significantly longer across every demographic studied. Other research has put the average cost of smoking at roughly seven years of life.

2. Maintain a healthy weight.

The same 2018 analysis found that maintaining a body mass index in the healthy range was consistently associated with longer life. Excess weight is tied to inflammation, cardiovascular strain, and metabolic disruption, all of which compound over decades.

3. Exercise at least 30 minutes a day.

Moderate daily physical activity was flagged one as well. Regular movement keeps your cardiovascular system efficient, your muscles functional, and your metabolic health in check. Separate research using the same dataset has found that consistent exercisers function biologically younger than their chronological age.

4. Drink alcohol only moderately, if at all.

The research consistently found moderate drinking — loosely defined as up to one drink per day for women, two for men — to be neutral to mildly beneficial compared to heavy drinking. This finding carries ongoing debate in the broader scientific literature, so maybe treat it as a general signal rather than a prescription.

5. Maintain a healthy diet.

The 2018 analysis defined this as scoring in the upper 40% on a diet quality index — which in practice means prioritizing vegetables, fruits, whole grains, and lean proteins, and limiting processed foods and added sugar.

6. Vary your exercise, not just the volume.

A more recent analysis of the same dataset, published in BMJ Medicine in January found that people who engaged in the broadest variety of physical activities — walking some days, lifting weights on others, gardening, cycling, playing tennis — had a 19% lower risk of premature death compared to those who exercised the same total amount but stuck to the same routines.

7. Drink two to three cups of caffeinated coffee a day.

Another study published earlier this year in JAMA, also drawing on the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, found that people who drank two to three cups of caffeinated coffee daily had an 18% lower risk of developing dementia compared to those who drank little or none. Tea showed similar patterns. Decaf did not.

The honest caveat

None of these findings prove causation. People who exercise in varied ways, drink moderate coffee, and eat well may share other traits — stronger social connections, better sleep, lower chronic stress — that also contribute to longer lives.

But after 50 years and more than 100,000 participants, they establish patterns that are very hard to dismiss.

The nurses who answered Frank Speizer’s letter in 1976 are mostly in their 80s and 90s now — or gone.

But they gave the world a cleaner picture of what a longer life tends to look like.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• Daily Mail: President Trump’s Justice Department beat the clock and struck a deal to settle his lawsuit against the IRS by funneling $1.776 billion in taxpayer money to his political allies, in a settlement that Democrats are calling the most corrupt act in presidential history. Settling the legal case likely short-circuited a scheduled judicial review.

• CNN: Sen. Bill Cassidy, one of seven Republicans who voted to convict Trump after January 6th, has lost his Louisiana primary — the first GOP senator Trump has helped oust. Cassidy: "When you participate in democracy, sometimes it doesn't turn out the way you want it to. But you don't pout, you don't whine, you don't claim the election was stolen."

• CNBC: New federal disclosures show President Trump made more than 3,600 individual stock trades in the first three months of 2026 — including buying between $500,000 and $1 million worth of Nvidia stock one week before the Commerce Department officially approved the sale of some Nvidia chips to China.

• AP: Commuters navigated a gauntlet of car, bus, and subway routes to get to work Monday after a strike on the Long Island Rail Road — North America’s largest commuter rail system, carrying 250,000 riders a day — entered its third day. Five unions representing more than 3,500 workers walked off over wages and healthcare costs; talks wrapped past 1 a.m. with no resolution.

• CNBC: NextEra Energy will buy Dominion Energy in an all-stock deal valued at nearly $67 billion, creating the world’s largest regulated electric utility. Dominion is the utility responsible for powering the world’s largest data center market in northern Virginia — meaning the deal is essentially a bet that AI’s electricity appetite is only getting started.

• ScienceDaily: Scientists in South Korea have discovered that a probiotic bacterium found in kimchi may help the body flush out tiny plastic particles before they build up in organs. In lab tests, the kimchi-derived microbe clung tightly to nanoplastics even in conditions mimicking the human intestine — and mice given the probiotic excreted more than twice as many nanoplastics as those that didn't receive it.

• EW: Shakira is celebrating a major legal victory. Spain's national court acquitted the Colombian pop star of tax fraud and overturned the $64 million fine imposed by the Spanish tax agency in 2021, ordering the country's tax authorities to repay her tens of millions of dollars.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. I wrote about some of this at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

I used to run into this as a new dad who also fancied himself a writer, when people would ask me how parenthood was going:

“Oh, it goes so fast!”

“It changes everything!”

“You can’t believe how much you love this little person!”

Finally I came up with shorthand: “All the clichés are true.”

Then I found I said that so often that even “All the clichés are true” became a bit of a cliché.

I bring all of this up today because of Norm MacDonald, the comedian, who in 2013, got some disquieting news: he’d been diagnosed with multiple myeloma.

It’s not the absolute worst possible diagnosis you can get, but it carries about a 50% five-year survival rate according to Dr. Wikipedia, and so I suspect it changes your outlook.

Norm didn’t tell anyone outside of a small group of family and his agent, not wanting the news to affect how people treated him.

Among the people he didn’t tell was David Letterman — whose Late Show he’d been on many times, and who was such a fan that he once remarked: “If we could have, we would have had Norm on every week.”

All good things come to an end, and in 2015, Letterman’s show was reaching its finale; each night was like one valedictory after another.

Norm was on the second-to-last night, after Oprah Winfrey. Tough act to follow. His routine stood out, however, and maybe it was because he knew the show wasn’t the only thing operating on borrowed time.

This was eleven years ago tomorrow. Here’s how it ended:

Listen folks — this will be my last time on the David Letterman Show. We all know that David Letterman was the greatest talk show host who ever lived.

But I remember Dave differently. Because the first time I saw him, I was 13 years old, living in Toronto, Canada. I went to a talk show they had there, and David Letterman was the stand-up comedian. He did this joke. I love this joke. It still stays with me as my favorite stand-up joke ever. So I’d like to do it for you:

I was on the street the other day and I saw a garbage truck, and on the back of the garbage truck there was a small sign that said: “Please do not follow too closely.”

Another of life’s simple pleasures ruined by meddling bureaucracy.

And then:

I know that Mr. Letterman is not for the maudlin, and he has no truck for the sentimental. But if something is true, it is not sentimental.

And I say, in truth — I love you.

Letterman was not in fact sentimental, and if you watch the video you can see him getting a bit uncomfortable even as he thanks Norm and says goodnight.

Sure enough, Norm did pass away in 2021.

I’ve been thinking about all of this because now Stephen Colbert’s version of the Late Show is ending.

Colbert lives just a few miles from me (bigger house, which suddenly seems like it relates almost too perfectly to Tuesday’s newsletter), and when I heard the news I thought, that’s too bad.

Then, I realized I hadn’t watched The Late Show in probably a year and a half.

It’s like when a restaurant you liked closes and you feel verklempt, and then you acknowledge you haven’t actually been there in 18 months, so maybe it’s kind of your fault.

Also, I think this is the beginning of the end of late night, which is OK, except to the point that it’s also a milestone on the way to people no longer having shared cultural touchstones.

Jimmy Kimmel is probably going to get axed, and while Jimmy Fallon doesn’t seem to pick as many fights as the others, his show has 1/3 the audience it did just a few years ago.

Once everyone became their own broadcaster, it was probably inevitable. Whether it’s something to cheer or mourn is probably a subject for another newsletter.

In the meantime: Say I love you. Be brave enough to be sentimental.

And remember: All the clichés are true.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• Axios — President Trump flew to Beijing on Tuesday under some of the darkest economic clouds of his political career, leaving behind a country reeling from the cost of everyday life. For now, Trump appears unconcerned, convinced that renewed inflation is temporary and that gas prices will plummet once he ends the Iran war.

• NYT — The race is on at the Justice Department, according to a report, to decide whether to settle Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS before May 20, when a judge wants arguments on whether he should dismiss the case. Besides a potential monetary payment, one option would reportedly require the IRS to drop any audits of Trump, his family members, or businesses.

• America — 45 years ago today (well, yesterday): Attempted assassination of St. John Paul II recalled as turning point in history.

• MSN — Members of President Donald Trump’s inner circle are secretly fed up with the aide who is enabling his unhinged late-night Truth Social rampages. Executive assistant Natalie Harp is reportedly the driving force behind some of his most incendiary content, including a racist video that depicted Barack and Michelle Obama as apes, and an AI-generated image of Trump as Jesus Christ, both of which Trump later took down.

• Reddit, but Conan O’Brien — As long as I am writing about Norm MacDonald, here’s his famous “moth joke.”

• Politico — Lawmakers on Capitol Hill were informed this week of a data breach involving the congressional medical office that may have compromised personal information — including their prescription history. It is not clear what foreign or domestic entity conducted the breach and where the sensitive data on lawmakers’ health could end up.

• AFP — ‘I applied to be pope’: Losing grip on reality while using ChatGPT. Tom Millar is one of an unknown number of people who have lost their grip on reality while communicating with chatbots, an experience tentatively being called AI-induced delusion or psychosis.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. See you in the comments.

Long ago, when I was a lawyer for a big government agency and I had to write briefs in scores or even hundreds of similar cases, I often relied on an old friend.

Copy and paste. Control-C and Control-V. (Maybe Command–C and Command-V if you’re on a Mac, as I am now but wasn’t then.)

Basically, I used big chunks of the same documents, the same arguments, the same filings—over and over and over. A few facts would be different; occasionally someone would raise a new issue.

But otherwise, it was pretty much Groundhog Day. My work friends and I shared our briefs with each other, too.

At times, it seemed the whole court system would be more efficient if we could just file one brief, and then refer various judges around the country to it, in case after case after case.

That wasn’t going to happen. Too many people’s livelihoods depended on the duplication. But, it turns out that there’s a single individual who deserves my thanks for making my life a bit more manageable back then.

The man who invented it

His name: Larry Tessler. This is the guy who came up with the idea of “cut, copy, and paste” in word processing in the first place.

Tessler worked for Xerox PARC in the late 1970s, where two experiences stand out:

1. His aforementioned development of “cut, copy and paste,” which came about while he was working on an early, 1970s word processing program called Gypsy. (More details on this from Andrew Liszewski at Gizmodo.)

2. His encounter with Steve Jobs, during the latter’s now-legendary tour of the Xerox PARC labs in 1979. This is when Jobs supposedly first was introduced to things Xerox was working on, like (a) graphical interfaces and (b) the mouse, that wound up in Apple products a few years later.

Not long after that visit, Tessler left Xerox and headed to the much-smaller Apple. As Luke Dormehl of Cult of Mac recalled him saying years later:

“It’s funny because Apple was really the trigger for me wanting to leave Xerox, but I’d never seriously considered it as a career option.

Even though I had been pretty impressed by the people who attended the PARC demo, I still thought of them as primarily being a hobbyist computer company.”

Tessler was at Apple from 1980 to 1997, working mainly on two products that are now known more for being groundbreaking than for being successful themselves: the Newton and the Lisa.

Like they say, “pioneers get slaughtered; settlers prosper.”

Typical Apple

Today, Dormehl holds up Tessler as having been typical among the fairly early recruits at Apple: equal parts tech visionary and bearded hippie.

He’d studied computer science at Stanford before working at Xerox. But in between, he’d also helped to found a commune in Oregon.

As you might gather from my use of the past tense in this newsletter, Tessler passed away a few years ago, at age 74.

We take things like “copy and paste” for granted. Heck, I’ve probably used it 10 times while writing today’s newsletter.

But, I once joined a digital media startup where we were dead-set on creating the world’s best proprietary content management system—basically, the software that writers use in order to write and publish their articles.

Our lead developer did a fantastic job. But can you guess what turned out to be the second-most-difficult feature to build from scratch?

Sure enough: Cut, copy and paste.

(Hardest: “Undo,” or “Control-Z,” because building this feature requires taking a virtual snapshot of every change in every document, every few milliseconds.)

Anyway, rest in peace Mr. Tessler. If only we could copy you so easily.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• NBC News — The U.S. military is considering officially renaming the war with Iran from “Operation Epic Fury” to “Operation Sledgehammer” if the current ceasefire collapses and President Donald Trump decides to re-start major combat operations, according to two U.S. officials. The intent apparently is to allow Trump to argue that it restarts the 60-day clock that requires congressional authorization for war.

• NPR — As Trump goes to China, what do Americans say about tariffs, Iran and world standing?

• The Hill — FBI Director Kash Patel said he would commit to taking a test about his alcohol use after a testy exchange with Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) in which each traded accusations with the other. Van Hollen pointed to a story in The Atlantic, which Patel has said is false, to raise questions about the FBI director’s drinking. “When your private actions make it impossible for you to perform your public duties, we have a big problem,” Van Hollen said to Patel during the hearing.

• AP News — Two South Florida police officers claim Ben Affleck and Matt Damon’s recent action thriller “The Rip” used too many real-life details in its fictionalized narrative, causing harm to the officers’ personal and professional reputations, according to a defamation lawsuit. Parts of the movie were inspired by a real 2016 case, where police found over $21 million linked to a suspected marijuana trafficker in a Miami Lakes home.

• Politico — Former President Joe Biden intends to intervene in litigation to block the Trump administration’s effort to release 70 hours of partially redacted audio recordings of interviews he conducted in 2017 with a ghostwriter who worked with Biden on his memoirs, the Justice Department indicated in new court papers.

• CBS News — A Texas couple whose son died of an overdose in 2025 after using OpenAI’s ChatGPT tool to get information about drugs sued the technology company on Tuesday, blaming the AI platform for his death.

• The New York Times — Hacky sacks are back: Teenagers are booting the game out of the 1990s. “It’s kind of bringing everybody together,” one said.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Today’s was a low power mode edition, and if you already know that, I love you. See you in the comments.

I got one of those “here’s a photo you shared on social media years ago” notifications, and it a photo of a moving truck — the day we moved to our house in New Jersey.

It’s funny how time flies. I’m the kind of person who takes a while to settle and admit that I actually live where I do, long-term. But knocking on the door of a decade, I think this counts.

As much as I sometimes like to imagine my wife and daughter and me taking a giant map of the world and figuring out a new place to live for a while (truly, just give me a beach!), I think the odds are very good that we’ll stay put here a while longer.

We chose our town for a reason: basically that everything we read, saw and experienced told us that it would be a good place to raise a child.

Now, I’m going to turn this newsletter over to all of you in a moment. Because the vast majority of my readers are parents, and I suspect you’ll have some thoughts on this.

But, there’s a study that I read about — gosh, back when we were looking for a place to live — that’s stuck with me, and it probably influenced our choices.

Entitled, “Inequality in Children’s Contexts: Income Segregation of Households With and Without Children,” it ran in the journal, American Sociological Review.

To summarize, just in case you forgot to renew your subscription to American Sociological Review, the study covered choices that wealthy families make in order to benefit their children—-given that theoretically, they could afford to make any choices they want.

The study was framed in a negative light: look how inequitable our society is, and what all these wealthy people are doing to benefit from it.

I read it, nodded my head in pained agreement — and then thought to myself:

“You know, as long as we’re here … um, exactly what are these big choices that wealthy families make? Anything I should try to copy?”

The number-one, most far-reaching conclusion in the study was simple: The wealthiest people make sure to live within the same neighborhoods as other wealthy people.

This has significant ramifications. For one thing, since schools in the U.S. are generally funded on a local level, the kids in the neighborhoods of the better-to-do have access to the best public education money can buy.

Ann Owens, a sociologist at the University of Southern California and an author of the study, told The Washington Post:

“Buying a neighborhood is probably one of the most important things you can do for your kid. There’s mixed evidence on whether buying all this other stuff matters too. But buying a neighborhood basically provides huge advantages.”

Granted, this touches on much bigger questions about what kind of society we want to live in, at large.

And, there’s no way a thinking person can write about this and not mention that years of racial segregation, redlining, and many other less-enviable parts of our collective history might have something to do with how some neighborhoods became wealthy in the first place.

But, if you’re making decisions on the basis of what’s best for your children, it’s hard not to at least pay attention to how the people who could decide to live anywhere, choose to make their homes.

In short, the study also seems to suggest: If you’re not living in the smallest house in your neighborhood, maybe you should consider a smaller house in a nicer neighborhood.

So now I turn it over to you. Did you choose where you live for this kind of reason? Or another? What advice to you have for others — especially young parents, just putting down roots? Please, let us know in the comments.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• NYT: President Trump will be joined in China this week by 16 chief executives, including Elon Musk and Tim Cook. The White House distributed a list on Monday of business leaders who are scheduled to be in Beijing with the president. Mr. Trump is slated to depart Washington on Tuesday and hold meetings with Xi Jinping, China’s leader, later in the week.

• AP, WSJ: President Trump on odds of ending the Iran War after the latest Iranian proposal: “I would call it the weakest right now after reading that piece of garbage they sent us. I didn’t even finish reading it.” Trump also proposed suspending the federal gas tax and reducing tariffs on imported beef, to deal with war-related price increases.

• Newsweek: Years of preparations and the promise of a multibillion-dollar economic boost were supposed to make the 2026 FIFA World Cup a summer-long victory lap for the United States. But with only a month until kick-off, hotels remain under-booked, tickets unsold, and travelers unconvinced, leaving the world’s most-watched sporting event at risk of falling short of its most ambitious expectations.

• NBC News: Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is defending his family’s new reality show amid a backlash, as critics say the idea of doing a road-trip show over the course of seven months “out of touch” when gas prices are soaring amid the U.S. war with Iran. (One commenter quoted: “Read the room, Mark and Marie Antoinette.”)

• Washington Post: About 25% Americans think the April shooting at the White House correspondents’ dinner was staged, compared to 45% who are confident that it actually happened, according to a new survey. Survey respondents between the ages of 18 and 29 were also more likely than older people to think the incident was staged, according to the report.

• The Guardian: Artwork looted by the Nazis has resurfaced in the home of descendants of a notorious Dutch SS collaborator. Portrait of a Young Girl, by the Dutch artist Toon Kelder, is believed to have hung for decades in the home, art detective Arthur Brand said, describing it as “the most bizarre case of my entire career.”

• Wired: I Tried the Best Captioning Smart Glasses, and Only One Leads the Pack: Can’t hear what they’re saying? Now you can turn on the subtitles for real-life conversations.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Photo by Eugene Kucheruk on Unsplash. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"I've tried for years to write about my life, but it never felt like the way I wanted it portrayed. Speaking was so much more natural — you could feel the emotion of those memories in a way the written word can't capture. I wish I'd had this for my parents."
— Dola H., Colorado

If you’d like to give Life Story Magic as a Mother’s Day gift, use code UNDERSTANDABLY at checkout for $100 off our already-discounted rate.

Mother’s Day is this Sunday, just sayin’. Give the gift this weekend, and there’s no expiration on the interview itself.

Reserve Your Place

So lonely

If you’ve spent any time reading about the science of happiness and longevity, you’ve probably run across the Harvard Grant Study — the 88-year research project that has followed the lives of hundreds of men beginning in 1938, including future President John F. Kennedy and Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee.

The clearest message from all those decades of data, according to Robert Waldinger, the Harvard psychiatrist who has been running the study since 2003: “Good relationships keep us happier and healthier. Period.”

Waldinger was specific about what loneliness does to the brain.

People who are more isolated than they want to be, he said, find that their health declines earlier in midlife, their brain functioning declines sooner, and they live shorter lives.

His TED talk on the subject has now been viewed nearly 28 million times on YouTube alone — which tells you something about how many people are thinking about this question.

Now a new study — a large one, tracking more than 10,000 people across Europe for seven years — has added a wrinkle to that story.

10,217 adults

Researchers tracked 10,217 adults between the ages of 65 and 94 across 12 European countries for seven years, using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe — one of the largest long-running studies of older adults on the continent.

Participants answered questions about how often they felt a lack of companionship, left out, or isolated. Their memory was tested regularly via word recall tasks.

People who reported higher levels of loneliness at the start of the study did score lower on memory tests — confirming what Waldinger and the Grant Study have long suggested. Loneliness and weaker memory go together.

Over the seven years of follow-up, however, lonely people’s memories declined at essentially the same rate as everyone else’s.

“The finding that loneliness significantly impacted memory, but not the speed of decline in memory over time was a surprising outcome,” said lead author Luis Carlos Venegas-Sanabria, from the Universidad del Rosario in Colombia. “It suggests that loneliness may play a more prominent role in the initial state of memory than in its progressive decline.”

The damage is real

This study doesn’t contradict Waldinger or the Grant Study. Loneliness is still associated with worse cognitive performance. The damage appears to be real.

If loneliness primarily affects where your memory starts rather than how fast it declines, however, then the most important window for intervention may be earlier than previously understood — before the deficit is established, not after.

The researchers suggest that routine screening for loneliness could become part of cognitive health assessments for older adults.

Given that the Grant Study found more than one in five Americans report feeling lonely at any given time, that’s not a small population to consider.

A few more points to consider

The study has real limitations. Loneliness was treated as fixed — measured at the start and assumed to stay constant — when anyone who has lived through a move, a divorce, a retirement, or a pandemic knows that feelings of isolation can shift dramatically over time.

The study was also conducted entirely in Europe. Cultural norms around social connection vary considerably from those in the United States.

Also, the researchers are appropriately cautious about what their findings mean for dementia risk specifically. This was a study of healthy older adults, not clinical populations — so the conclusions don’t extend cleanly to people already experiencing cognitive decline.

Still, Waldinger’s core message from the Grant Study holds: Relationships matter, probably more than many people act like they do.

If anything, this newer research adds urgency because if loneliness shapes where your memory starts, the time to do something about it isn’t when you notice the decline.

It’s well before that.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• Axios: The White House believes it’s close to an agreement with Iran to end the war. Among other provisions, the deal would involve Iran committing to a moratorium on nuclear enrichment, the U.S. agreeing to lift its sanctions and release billions in frozen Iranian funds, and both sides lifting restrictions around transit through the Strait of Hormuz.

• Politico: President Trump’s Justice Department will ask the Supreme Court to let it intervene in Trump’s appeal of the $83.3 million jury verdict in a defamation lawsuit brought by the writer E. Jean Carroll. DOJ wants to substitute the federal government itself for Trump as the defendant, which would end Carroll’s case, because the United States can’t be sued for defamation.

• MSNOW: The FBI has launched a criminal leak investigation focusing on an Atlantic magazine journalist who wrote a deeply unflattering account last month of Director Kash Patel’s work habits. The journalist, Sarah Fitzpatrick, cited two dozen anonymous sources in a detailed story reporting that Patel’s alcohol consumption and erratic behavior had caused deep concern among FBI officials.

• Miami Herald: Palm Beach County approved a trademark deal with one of Donald Trump’s family companies to rename the county’s airport after the president. The agreement gives Trump veto power over how his image and biographical information is used in marketing materials.

• New Scientist: Gamblers have bet $9 million on how many people will be infected with measles in the U.S. on prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket – and there is some evidence that the predictions are accurate enough to be useful for modeling its spread.

• Hollywood Reporter: Ted Turner, the media visionary who forever altered the news business by founding CNN and helped introduce Americans to pay TV by creating cable channels like TNT, Turner Classic Movies and Cartoon Network, has died. He was 87.

• AP: WKRP isn’t dead — as of Monday, it’s living on the air in Cincinnati. The call letters from the fictional radio station featured in a CBS sitcom were adopted by a trio of real “adult hits” stations in time for Monday’s morning drive, and co-owner Jeff Ziesmann described listeners as “stoked.” The show “WKRP in Cincinnati” ran from 1978 to 1982 and starred Loni Anderson, Howard Hesseman, Tim Reid and Richard Sanders.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Photo by Lukas Rychvalsky on Unsplash. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

“Got Life Story Magic for mom's 83rd birthday. I learned so much! Having an artifact like this is priceless. When I saw how excited she was about the interview, it really brought me joy.”
— Sandee C., Tennessee

Thanks to everyone who signed up over the weekend and yesterday! I’m excited to get started.

If you’d like to give Life Story Magic as a Mother’s Day gift, use code UNDERSTANDABLY at checkout for $100 off our already-discounted rate.

Mother’s Day is May 11 — and don’t worry, there’s no expiration on the interview itself.

Reserve Your Place

Intermittent fasting

According to the International Food Information Council’s 2025 survey, 15 percent of Americans say they are currently doing intermittent fasting — up from 12 percent in 2023.

Every once in a while, I think I ought to have joined them.

I wrote an article here five years ago (if you were here then, I love you) suggesting it might improve memory — based on a study out of King’s College London — but I still never actually gave it a shot.

As it turns out, it may have been the right call — though probably not for the reasons I would have guessed.

More than 3,000 adults

Researchers at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health tracked more than 7,000 adults between the ages of 40 and 65, collecting data on meal timing, weight, lifestyle habits, and diet.

Five years later, more than 3,000 of those participants came back for follow-up measurements, and the researchers found that two habits were independently linked to lower BMI over that period:

• The first was eating breakfast early in the day.

• The second was extending the overnight fasting window — meaning finishing dinner early and not eating again until morning.

What was not linked to weight benefit: skipping breakfast as a form of intermittent fasting.

Among a subset of men who practiced intermittent fasting specifically by skipping breakfast and eating their first meal after 2 p.m., researchers found no advantage for body weight at all.

That group also tended to have other markers of less healthy living — more smoking, more drinking, less physical activity, and lower adherence to a healthy diet.

“There are different ways of practicing what is known as ‘intermittent fasting,’” explained Camille Lassale, ISGlobal researcher and senior co-author of the study. “What we observed in a subgroup of men who do intermittent fasting by skipping breakfast is that this practice has no effect on body weight.”

Chrononutrition

The researchers place their findings in an emerging field called chrononutrition — the study of not just what you eat, but when, and how meal timing interacts with the body’s internal clock.

The body’s circadian system is built around the rhythms of day and night and the physiological processes that accompany them.

• Eating earlier in the day appears to align better with those rhythms, allowing for better calorie processing and appetite regulation.

• Eating late and skipping breakfast works against that clock, regardless of how long the fasting window technically is.

Thus, a 16-hour fast that runs from 10 p.m. to 2 p.m. the next day may not be doing what people assume.

The same fasting window shifted earlier — finishing dinner at 7 p.m. and eating breakfast at 7 a.m. — appears to be a different thing biologically.

Earlier ISGlobal research connected the same early-eating patterns to lower risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, reinforcing the idea that timing has consequences that extend well beyond weight.

39 million people

The study was conducted entirely in Spain, which has a distinctive meal-timing culture. Dinner is typically eaten much later than in the United States. So, the baseline comparisons may not translate directly.

The research is observational, not a controlled experiment. So, it can’t prove that meal timing caused the differences in weight.

“Recommendations will have to wait for more robust evidence,” said Luciana Pons-Muzzo, one of the study’s lead researchers.

There are roughly 260 million adults in the United States. If the IFIC’s 15 percent figure is right, that works out to somewhere around 39 million people currently doing intermittent fasting.

If even a small portion of them have built their practice around skipping breakfast, this research ought to give them something to think about.

That said, the King’s College study I wrote about five years ago suggested intermittent fasting may have memory benefits that this research doesn’t address.

Maybe I’ll finally give it a try — just not the way most people apparently do it.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• Axios: The ACLU is urging Louisianans to vote in U.S. House races even after Gov. Jeff Landry purportedly canceled them, as legal challenges move through the courts. The House candidates remain on the ballot for early voting; one assumes the point here is to create a record of people trying to vote for the judicial record.

• NBC News: For months, President Trump portrayed the big new ballroom he’s building at the White House as a gift to the nation, courtesy of patriotic private donors. “No government funds,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office last November. But, Republicans are now proposing $1 billion in taxpayer dollars to secure the ballroom.

• The Financial Times: Global airlines have cut 2 million seats from their May schedules within the past two weeks, as concerns about fuel availability in the coming weeks intensify. Since the start of the Iran war in late February, the cost of jet fuel has doubled, forcing airlines to raise ticket prices, while the closure of Gulf airports that connected a third of European journeys to Asia has thrown global travel into disarray.

• WSJ: Why the Collapse of Spirit Airlines Means Higher Fares for Everyone: Defunct budget airline had long been a competitive force on lower-cost tickets.

• AP: Alberta separatists said Monday they have formally submitted 302,000 signatures to try to trigger a referendum on the province leaving Canada. It could go on a ballot as early as October, but a “yes” vote would not trigger independence automatically. Negotiations with the federal government would have to take place and Indigenous groups could use the courts to stop independence from happening.

• CNN: White House border czar Tom Homan brushed off critics within President Trump’s base who say the administration is not deporting enough people, promising to “flood the zone” with immigration officers. “For the people out there saying ‘President Trump’s getting weak on mass deportation,’ you don’t know what the hell you’re talking about,” Homan said, referring to such naysayers as “keyboard warriors.”

• KDVR: A spring snowstorm is bringing inches of snow to Colorado, from the mountains to the Denver area and stretching across much of the state. The May storm comes after a warm and dry winter. In February, Denver had no measurable snow, only the second time on record the city was without snow for the month.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"Bill knows how to ask the questions that actually matter. I gave this as a gift to my 92-year-old father and my wife — watching both of them light up as they told their stories was worth the price alone. They both felt genuinely special, heard, and valued. Don't wait too long!"
— Chris C., California

Thanks to everyone who signed up over the weekend — I’m excited to get started.

If you’d like to give Life Story Magic as a Mother’s Day gift, use code UNDERSTANDABLY for $100 off our already-discounted rate. Mother’s Day is May 11 — and don’t worry, there’s no expiration on the interview itself.

Reserve Your Place

Scientists have a term for the slow, smoldering inflammation that builds up in the brain’s memory center as you age: “neuroinflammaging.”

It quietly degrades the cellular machinery that keeps you sharp, making it harder to form new memories, think clearly, and adapt to new situations.

For decades, researchers considered it essentially unavoidable — a tax on getting older that everyone eventually pays.

Now, a team at Texas A&M University just published new research suggesting that may not be true.

“Brain age-related diseases like dementia are a major health concern worldwide,” said Ashok Shetty of Texas A&M’s Institute for Regenerative Medicine, who led the research. “What we’re showing is brain aging can be reversed, to help people stay mentally sharp, socially engaged, and free from age-related decline.”

A nasal spray?

The researchers developed a therapy using microscopic biological “delivery parcels,” called extracellular vesicles, loaded with genetic cargo that targets the inflammation pathways driving brain aging.

The surprising thing is the delivery route: a nasal spray, which means the vesicles travel directly into the brain’s memory center by way of the olfactory nerves, bypassing the brain’s notoriously difficult-to-cross protective barrier.

“The mode of delivery is one of the most exciting aspects of our approach,” said Maheedhar Kodali, a senior researcher. “Intranasal delivery allows us to reach, and treat, the brain directly without invasive procedures.”

The entire treatment is just two doses. The findings were published in the Journal of Extracellular Vesicles.

In aging mice, the results were striking. Within weeks of treatment, the researchers observed dramatically reduced chronic brain inflammation, recharged mitochondria — the cellular power plants inside neurons — and measurably improved memory and object recognition.

The results held for months. Unlike many studies where outcomes vary by sex, the therapy worked equally well in males and females — something the researchers specifically flagged.

Treated animals recognized familiar objects and detected changes in their environment more like younger animals than their untreated peers.

“We are seeing the brain’s own repair systems switch on, healing inflammation and restoring itself,” Shetty said.

Texas A&M has filed a U.S. patent on the therapy.

“Successful brain aging”

To be clear, this research was conducted in mice, not humans. So, it’s not as if you’re going to go to the pharmacy tomorrow and find this kind of nasal spray on the shelves right next to the allergy medicines.

Plenty of promising animal studies have not translated to clinical success in people, and brain research has a long track record of findings that looked revolutionary in a lab and proved far more complicated in practice.

So, the path from here to a human treatment runs through clinical-grade manufacturing, FDA approval for trials, and collaboration with biotech companies — a process that typically takes years.

That said, it’s worth noting for at least two reasons beyond the “nasal spray” curiosity:

• First, this is the same lab’s second major finding in this area. Their earlier work focused on Alzheimer’s disease specifically. This newer study expands the scope to normal brain aging, suggesting the underlying approach may be broadly applicable rather than disease specific.

• Second, the conceptual shift here is significant. The scientific consensus has long treated brain aging as a one-way street. However, this research, and a growing body of work like it, suggests is that the inflammation driving cognitive decline may be a target, not a given.

“We are aiming for successful brain aging,” Shetty said. “Keeping people engaged, alert, and connected. Not just living longer but living smarter and healthier.”

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• Axios: The U.S. is using force in the Strait of Hormuz and diplomacy in New York in an effort to break Tehran’s chokehold on the vital shipping lane. Why it matters: Iran has already shown it’s willing to respond with force, putting the two countries on the verge of a return to full-fledged war.

• AFP: A massive land, air and sea search continues for two U.S. soldiers who disappeared while on a training deployment in southern Morocco, amid fears they may have fallen off seaside cliffs and into the ocean. “I can confirm this incident is not related to terrorism but appears to be an accident,” a U.S. official said.

• Fast Company: A viral influencer wants to buy Spirit Airlines and run it like the Green Bay Packers. Could it work? Hunter Peterson wants to turn Spirit, which suspended operations over the weekend, into an airline ‘for the people.’ The internet’s response proves how dire air travel has become.

• Benzinga: Warren Buffett warned that financial markets are increasingly being driven by speculation rather than long-term investing, saying he has “never had people in a more gambling mood than now.” Speaking in a CNBC interview during Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s annual shareholders meeting, the longtime investor criticized the surge in short-term trading behavior, particularly the rise of options trading and prediction-style bets.

• Politico: Inside the Quiet Republican Effort to Flip Fetterman: As the Pennsylvania Democrat increasingly is isolated within his own party, Republicans are quietly trying to win him over. Trump has made the sell, offering his patented total and complete endorsement plus a financial windfall to the Pennsylvanian.

• L.A. Times: In Bel-Air, a $400-million mega-mansion aims for the national price record.

• NPR: A new bipartisan bill in Congress aims to curb what lawmakers say are predatory collection practices by so-called “claim shark” companies that charge disabled veterans for help claiming benefits. The legislation was prompted by a 2025 NPR investigation of how a Florida company was using auto-dialer software to access a VA benefits hotline meant for veterans, and then sending veterans a bill if their payments increased.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

I like things that are easy. When I find a study saying the way I sleep, the amount of coffee I drink, or the things I do for fun are actually good for me, I latch onto it.

The same instinct applies in business. So when WalletHub announced that it had studied more than 1,300 small cities across the United States to figure out which ones were the best and worst places to start a business, I pored over the numbers, and I think I found a cheat code hiding in plain sight.

Short version: Go where the people are.

First, the list

WalletHub ranked cities with populations between 25,000 and 100,000 by 18 metrics — everything from the growth rate of small businesses to investor access, labor costs, office space affordability, and commute times.

Here are the top 10:

1. St. George, Utah

2. Fort Myers, Florida

3. Washington City, Utah

4. Bozeman, Montana

5. Greenville, South Carolina

6. Cedar City, Utah

7. Boca Raton, Florida

8. Cheyenne, Wyoming

9. Ocala, Florida

10. Dover, Delaware

A pattern emerges

Once you get past the top section, a pattern emerges that’s hard to ignore.

Florida and Utah cities just keep showing up:

South Bradenton, Florida (No. 11); Lake Worth Beach, Florida (12); Midvale, Utah (14); Palm Beach Gardens, Florida (15); Horizon West, Florida (16); East Lake-Orient Park, Florida (17); Springville, Utah (19); Herriman, Utah (21); Winter Park, Florida (22).

Nine of the next 12 spots belong to either Florida or Utah.

OK, but why?

The short explanation: Both of these states have seen exceptional population growth in recent years. Florida added 467,000 residents in a single year, from 2023 to 2024.

Utah tied Texas for third-fastest-growing state in 2024 at a 1.8 percent growth rate, and it has grown from 2.76 million residents in 2010 to more than 3.5 million today. Over the past 15 years, both states have added residents at roughly three times the national median rate.

Interestingly, they’re growing for different reasons.

• Florida’s growth is largely migration-driven: retirees, remote workers, post-pandemic movers looking for lower taxes and warmer winters. That influx tends to bring capital and consumers.

• Utah’s story is different. The state has the highest per-capita rate of natural increase — meaning births over deaths — of any state in the country. Its growth is younger, more organic, and more distributed across smaller cities rather than concentrated in one or two dominant metros.

Why not Texas? Why not Nevada?

Two other fast-growing states are conspicuously absent from the top of the list: Texas and Nevada. So why don’t they show up here?

The answer is that this was a study of small cities, and while both states have seen enormous population growth, it’s overwhelmingly concentrated in their large metros.

More than 90 percent of Texas residents live in metropolitan counties, and over 95 percent of the state’s population growth from 2020 to 2023 occurred in just 26 metropolitan statistical areas — Houston, Dallas, Austin, San Antonio, etc.

Those cities are too large to qualify for this study, and the smaller Texas cities simply aren’t riding the same wave.

Nevada is an even more extreme case. Clark County — home to Las Vegas — accounts for more than two-thirds of the entire state’s population, and 92 percent of all Nevadans live in urban areas.

Utah’s growth, by contrast, is more distributed. The St. George and Washington City corridor in the state’s southwest isn’t a spillover from Salt Lake City — it’s its own genuine small-city growth story.

Not just about where

Plenty of companies serve national or global markets regardless of where they’re headquartered. However, if you can identify a business whose natural market is a growing population segment, you’ve found the same tailwind in a different form.

A few examples worth thinking about:

• Adults older than 65: The U.S. Census Bureau projects this group will outnumber children under 18 for the first time in American history by 2034.

• Pet owners: The American Pet Products Association estimates Americans spent over $150 billion on their pets in 2023, a number that has essentially doubled in a decade.

• Remote and hybrid workers: The share of Americans working from home at least part-time has stabilized at roughly three to four times its pre-pandemic level.

The geographic cheat code and the demographic cheat code work the same way: You’re not fighting the current. You’re letting it carry you.

Why make it difficult?

WalletHub’s full methodology weights business environment, access to resources, and cost of doing business.

But, I keep coming back to the simple version. Business is hard, and starting a business is harder.

There are a hundred things working against you that you can’t control — the economy, timing, competition, and luck.

Population growth is a tailwind: more potential customers, a deeper talent pool, and a market that’s expanding rather than contracting. It won’t save a bad business, but all other things being equal, it improves your odds.

Now, let me tell you a little bit about coffee …

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• Reuters: The U.S. Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in a 6 to 3 decision Wednesday, making it harder for minorities to challenge electoral maps as racially discriminatory under the landmark civil rights law. “I love it,” President Trump told reporters after hearing of the decision.

• Politico, Clarion-Ledger, AL.com, Mediaite: Within hours afterward, Florida passed a new congressional map that could help the GOP pick up four more seats, Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves called for a special session on redistricting, Alabama’s attorney general pledged to “act as quickly as possible,” and Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) called on her state’s legislature to quickly eliminate all House districts in the state held by Democrats.

• The Deseret News: Can the U.S. cope with a shrinking population? Statistics show a decline could begin much quicker than perviously thought. (This one is especially interesting to me after above about how Utah — home of the Deseret News — has a growing population.)

• Fox News: Speaking of growing markets, the Pentagon is seeking roughly $55 billion for drone and autonomous warfare programs in its fiscal year 2027 budget, as battlefield conflicts from the Middle East to Ukraine expose a growing problem: cheap drones are increasingly able to overwhelm costly U.S. defenses. The funding request is a dramatic surge from roughly $225 million a year earlier.

• The Wall Street Journal: Trump Tells Aides to Prepare for Extended Blockade of Iran: The president prefers decisive victories, but none of the available options provides him with a swift exit from the conflict.

• WAMU: The administration is seeking access to the health records of millions of federal workers including their prescriptions, diagnoses, and doctor visits. Reporter Amanda Seitz, who broke the story, says the Office of Personnel Management’s notice makes no mention of removing identifying information: “The names of patients, doctors, and their specific diagnoses could all be available to the federal government.”

• The New York Times: A.I. Bots Told Scientists How to Make Biological Weapons: Scientists shared transcripts in which chatbots described how to assemble deadly pathogens and unleash them in public spaces.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

If you’ve been getting something out of Understandably and are in a position to support it, becoming a premium subscriber helps more than you might think. It’s been six years of work I care deeply about, and your support keeps it going.

If it’s not the right time, I understand completely. We’re still friends!

But if you’re in a position to help out, I’m grateful. Thanks!

Subscribe now

Ode to Sleepy

When I was an attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice long ago, we had some real characters working with us. One of them was a lawyer who kept a pillow and a comforter under his desk.

Every afternoon, he’d quietly close his door, lay down on the floor, and take a nap. He’d get annoyed if anyone woke him up.

The rest of us thought it was somewhere between eccentric and genius, but he was a good guy and very generous in sharing the briefs he wrote and filed in court. I’ll admit it — I was mostly jealous. The idea of stretching out and actually sleeping in the middle of the day, in a federal building seemed like a win.

I’m not going to use his real name here, but let’s just call him Sleepy. Anyone who worked with me back then might know who I mean.

It turns out Sleepy was ahead of his time.

‘Lay on the floor’

Scott Kirby is the CEO of United Airlines, which by available seat miles is the largest airline in the world. He runs an organization of roughly 100,000 people and is responsible for an operation that doesn’t stop, sleep, or really forgive mistakes.

He also takes a 20-minute nap on the floor of his office almost every day.

In a recent interview with McKinsey Global Managing Partner Bob Sternfels, Kirby described the habit plainly.

“Throughout my whole career, when I’m in the office, I’ll close the door and take a 20-minute nap. When I first got to United, people were, like, ‘Oh my God, where do you take a nap?’ I said, ‘I lay on the floor.’”

His team promptly offered to get him a couch. He declined to make a big deal of it.

“When you’re tired, your brain is not 100%. If you’re not 100%, you shouldn’t be making decisions.”

Churchill, LBJ, Edison, and Dali

Kirby’s company goes back a long way (meaning the company he keeps, not United Airlines):

Winston Churchill kept a bed in the Houses of Parliament so he’d never miss his afternoon nap.

He even napped through the Blitz: “Nature has not intended mankind to work from eight in the morning until midnight without that refreshment of blessed oblivion which, even if it only lasts twenty minutes, is sufficient to renew all the vital forces.”

Lyndon Johnson ran what he called a two-shift day. He’d work through the morning, exercise after lunch, change into his pajamas, nap for 30 minutes, then change back and work a second shift that sometimes ran until 1 or 2 in the morning.

Thomas Edison publicly dismissed sleep as a waste of time, claimed he only needed three or four hours a night, and apparently considered napping a character flaw. He also napped constantly, and there are photographs of him asleep in labs, on workbenches, in libraries.

Perhaps my favorite all-time napper however was Salvador Dalí, who approached everything with a certain theatrical commitment.

He’d sit in a chair holding a bundle of keys over a silver plate. When he fell asleep and dropped them, the crash woke him, which he believed translated to a micro-nap deep enough to access his subconscious without letting him slide into REM.

Ah yes, the science

At the risk of prompting you to take a nap right now, let’s just say that there is science on this that’s been piling up for years, and it keeps pointing in the same direction:

• A European study of 90 adults found that even a 20-minute nap improved the odds of a creative breakthrough — with deeper naps producing results in 85.7% of participants, compared to 55.5% of those who stayed awake.

• Harvard Medical School research showed that sleep spindles — brief bursts of brain activity during light non-REM sleep — actually target the specific regions you used during learning. The stronger those spindles, the better performance afterward.

• And, a Rice University and Weill Cornell study found that even 30 minutes of light sleep improved performance on cognitive tasks and produced measurable changes in how neurons fire and synchronize.

Our napping brains are apparently consolidating, refining, and reorganizing — doing work that waking thought can’t replicate.

So what’s stopping you?

Probably the same thing that was stopping us back at DOJ — the feeling that lying down in the middle of the day is somehow an admission of weakness — or else, at least the kind of thing that gets you a goofy nickname and leads to someone else writing about you in an email newsletter two decades later.

But then again: Churchill pushed through some fairly serious things, as did LBJ. Kirby is running the largest airline in the world, and Dalí somehow managed to nap while not crushing that bizarre, trademark moustache.

Here’s to you, Sleepy, for figuring it out while the rest of us were muddling on. The comforter under the desk is starting to look like the obvious move.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• The Bulwark: The White House unveiled a radical redesign of new U.S. passports to include a prominent picture of President Trump. The passports, apparently a limited edition to celebrate America 250, will feature a scowling image of Trump superimposed over the Declaration of Independence, along with Trump’s signature in gold.

• Associated Press: King Charles visits Washington with hopes of restoring the US-UK relationship.

• Reuters: Republicans in Congress are pushing for legislation to fund Trump’s White House ballroom project at taxpayer expense. Trump previously had said that private donations would ​cover the estimated $400 million cost.

• Axios: The share of Americans who say their financial situation is getting worse is now 55%, the highest point in 25 years (including during the pandemic and the financial crisis) according to new Gallup data. Last year, the percentage was 53%; in 2024 it was 47%.

• Yahoo Finance: Backers of a proposed tax on California billionaires say they have collected enough signatures to bring the measure to a statewide vote. Unions say the tax would prevent hospital closures and fund public education; opponents say the tax would simply fuel an exodus of wealthy company founders.

• CNBC: The United Arab Emirates is leaving OPEC on May 1. The shock announcement Tuesday comes after the UAE was the target of missile and drone attacks for weeks by Iran (which is also a member of OPEC). The UAE It was the group’s third-largest oil producer in February behind Saudi Arabia and Iraq.

• The National: Speaking of the UAE, its flag carrier Emirates has shared plans to introduce private en-suite bathrooms on board its aircraft - the first in the world to do so.

• Associated Press: How 2 men claimed an absurd record by driving an old 3-wheel car the length of Africa: They had help from sponsors and crowd funding, and documented the journey on an Instagram page that pulled in nearly 100,000 followers under the title: “14,000 miles, 3 wheels, 0 common sense.”

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

If you’ve been getting something out of Understandably and are in a position to support it, becoming a premium subscriber helps more than you might think. It’s been six years of work I care deeply about, and your support keeps it going.

If it’s not the right time, I understand completely. We’re still friends!

But if you’re in a position to help out, I’m grateful. Thanks!

Subscribe now

Honey, Have You Seen…?

I’m like, big into vibe-coding now, and one of my not-ready-for-prime-time creations is an app I’d previously joked about building forever. It’s called Honey, Have You Seen…?

Open it, type in something you’ve misplaced — your keys, your wallet, the reading glasses that were on your head — and the app responds the way a helpful spouse would:

Could it be in the car? Did you check the counter? Is it in the pocket of the jeans you wore yesterday?

(Also me: Oh my God, I have so much I have to get done today!)

Anyway, it turns out that “honey have you” dynamic may be doing a lot more than helping you find your sunglasses. It might be correlated to a lower likelihood of getting cancer.

Researchers at Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Miami analyzed more than 4 million cancer cases between 2015 and 2022 and published their findings in Cancer Research Communications.

The main question: are married people less likely to get cancer? The results:

• Adults who had never married had substantially higher rates of developing cancer than those who were or had been married.

• Men who had never married were about 70% more likely to develop cancer than married men.

• Women who had never married were about 85% more likely to develop cancer than women who were or had been married.

For some specific cancers, the gaps were even more pronounced.

Of course, getting married doesn’t magically prevent cancer. People who smoke less, drink less, and take better care of themselves may also be more likely to get — and stay — married.

But a few mechanisms are worth taking seriously. The benefit associated with marriage may have less to do with the institution itself and more to do with what it tends to provide — a built-in accountability partner who asks the questions you might otherwise skip.

Married people tend to have stronger social support and more economic stability — plus a partner who notices when something’s off.

The kind of partner who says: You’ve been coughing for three weeks. Maybe call the doctor.

The associations were especially strong for cancers tied to infection, smoking, and alcohol — areas where a partner’s influence could plausibly matter — and stronger in adults over 50, suggesting the effect builds over time.

This study began in 2015, the year same-sex marriage was legalized nationwide, specifically so it could include married same-sex couples — hence why it’s one of the more contemporary and inclusive analyses on this topic.

“With the prevalence of marriage decreasing in the U.S., this is something that should be further studied,” said co-author Paulo Pinheiro, a professor of cancer epidemiology at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine.

The researchers aren’t in the business of dispensing relationship advice, but the study has a clear practical takeaway.

“If you’re not married, you should be paying extra attention to cancer risk factors, getting any screenings you may need, and staying up to date on health care,” said Frank Penedo, associate director for population sciences at Sylvester.

So the next time your spouse asks where you’ve been and reminds you that you’re two years overdue for a physical, maybe resist the eye roll.

After all — and I say this as someone who built the app — there’s a version of Honey, Have You Seen…? that ends not with your keys, but with people (me!) acting like a grownup and taking care of themselves a bit more than they otherwise would.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• The Hill: President Trump and his political allies are pointing to Saturday’s shooting at the White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) dinner as proof of the need for his planned ballroom on White House grounds. The Department of Justice called on the National Trust for Historic Preservation to drop its lawsuit against the administration over the ballroom in the wake of the shooting. A lawyer from the preservation group said no.

• Yahoo News: UFC CEO Dana White’s description of the chaos at the WHCA: “Tables getting flipped over, guys running in with guns and they were screaming ‘Get down.’ I didn’t get down. It was f*cking awesome. I literally took every minute of it in, and it was a pretty crazy, unique experience.”

• NBC Sports: Kenyan Sabastian Sawe broke the two-hour barrier in the marathon, winning the London Marathon in an unofficial 1 hour, 59 minutes, 30 seconds, shattering the previous record of 2:00:35. The runner-up on Sunday, Ethiopian Yomif Kejelcha, ran 1:59:41 in his marathon debut.

• USA Today: A bipartisan group of lawmakers joined forces on a bill to broaden access to a beloved grocery store staple, aptly called the “Hot Rotisserie Chicken Act.” The idea is to let recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) use benefits to purchase the popular cooked chickens. Currently, the purchase of hot prepared foods is prohibited under SNAP.

• The Hill: President Trump endorsed the idea of changing the name of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to National Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which would give the agency the acronym NICE. “GREAT IDEA!!! DO IT,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.

• Defense One: The Pentagon replicated a Ukrainian-style drone attack in Florida. Now it’s changing its counter-drone strategy.

• The Telegraph: No sex please, we’re on Mars! Inside the simulated red planet mission: Six participants live and work under conditions that mirror long‑duration Space expeditions.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Photo by Vitaly Gariev on Unsplash. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.

If you’ve been getting something out of Understandably and are in a position to support it, becoming a premium subscriber helps more than you might think. It’s been six years of work I care deeply about, and your support keeps it going.

If it’s not the right time, I understand completely. We’re still friends!

But if you’re in a position to help out, I’m grateful. Thanks!

Subscribe now

A few weeks ago, I visited my parents. My dad told me he thought I looked good.

“Have you lost weight?” he said. “What are you now, 150?”

This was one of those funny moments where guessing wrong kind of undermines the compliment. Yes, I have lost a lot of weight — but I haven’t been 150 pounds since probably 8th grade.

Saying that I was down to around 170 sounded a bit underwhelming by comparison — even though I’m proud of what I’ve done.

It’s one thing when your dad guesses your weight wrong, but it’s another thing entirely when your doctor makes a similar mistake — or for that matter, perhaps, if we were to learn that an entire, commonly used but oft-maligned metric might also be getting things wrong.

That’s exactly what’s been happening with the way medical professionals calculate body mass index (also known as BMI), at least if a new study is accurate.

BMI is simply your weight divided by your height squared, so it should be pretty hard to mess up.

But, by definition it doesn’t break down how much of your weight is fat, or where that fat is located in your body, nor does it distinguish between a person who is 200 pounds of muscle and a person who is 200 pounds with very little muscle.

Doctors and fitness professionals have been saying this for decades, but the metric has persisted — in clinical care, in insurance underwriting, in public health policy — largely because it’s free, fast, and requires nothing more than a scale and a tape measure.

The new study, published in the journal Nutrients and being presented at the European Congress on Obesity next month, put that persistence to the test.

Researchers took 1,351 adults — ages 18 to 98 — and compared their standard WHO BMI classifications against their actual body fat, measured using DXA scanning.

DXA, or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, is the gold standard for measuring body composition, because it directly measures fat, muscle, and bone. The findings:

• Among people BMI labeled as overweight, more than half were in the wrong category when measured by actual body fat — and of those, roughly three-quarters turned out to be normal weight.

• Among people BMI labeled obese, about one in three was actually only overweight. And among people BMI labeled underweight, two-thirds were actually normal weight.

Overall, more than one-third of adults in the study were placed in the wrong weight category entirely.

Caveats:

• The sample in this study was entirely White Caucasian adults in northern Italy, and the researchers cite this as a limitation, since BMI is already known to perform differently across ethnic groups.

• Also, overall rates of overweight and obesity in societies look similar whether you use BMI or DXA at the population level; the researchers say that’s because mismatches for individual people might cancel each other out in the aggregate.

All of this comes at a remarkable moment in weight medicine.

GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy have upended how millions of people think about and pursue weight loss.

Employers are grappling with whether to cover them, insurers are drawing eligibility lines, and doctors are deciding who qualifies.

Many of those decisions flow, directly or indirectly, through BMI.

If the tool getting used to make those calls is wrong for more than one in three of the people it touches, that’s a big problem.

Ironically, we’re still figuring out the full size of a problem that’s entirely about measuring size.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Other things worth knowing …

• NPR, CNN: Virginia took a step on Tuesday to counter and possibly surpass President Trump’s national effort to redraw congressional voting maps in favor of the GOP as voters narrowly approved a Democratic-backed constitutional amendment to sideline let lawmakers directly implement a new map.

• The Athletic: FIFA is considering asking President Donald Trump for a full moratorium on ICE raids across the United States during the World Cup this summer. European nations also privately relayed concerns from their fans about potential ICE activity during the tournament.

• The New York Times: The F.B.I. began investigating a New York Times reporter after she wrote a story about Director Kash Patel using bureau personnel to provide his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, with government security and transportation. Some Justice Department officials saw the inquiry as retaliation for an article that Mr. Patel and his girlfriend did not like. It was determined there was no legal basis to proceed with the investigation.

• The Independent: Tucker Carlson, increasingly at odds with Trump over the Iran War, has expressed buyer’s remorse over his role in getting the president elected. “Millions of people like us are the reason this is happening right now,” the former Fox News star said, adding: “[W]e’re implicated in this for sure ... We’ll be tormented by it for a long time. I will be. And I want to say I’m sorry for misleading people.”

• Futurism: Chinese Workers Horrified as Bosses Direct Them to Train Their AI Replacements: Why would they choose to dig their own graves?

• WSJ: More young Americans are turning to trade school to pursue in-demand jobs like plumbing and electrical work but encountering something they didn’t expect: hefty price tags. Nationwide, trade and technical school revenue hit $5.1 billion in the last quarter of 2025, up 41% from four years before that, according to federal data.

• NBC News: Elizabeth Smart is adding a new title to her résumé: bodybuilder. The 38-year-old Smart — whose terrifying abduction story is told in the 2025 Netflix documentary, “Kidnapped: Elizabeth Smart”— revealed the career pivot with a picture of herself on Instagram from a recent bodybuilding competition: “This was a big change for me, it was hard, it pushed me, challenged me not to give up. I am so proud of myself for doing this. I am so proud of my body, and I want to celebrate it,” she wrote.

Subscribe now

Share

Leave a comment

Thanks for reading. Photo by Alex Engelman on Unsplash. I wrote about some of this before at Inc.com. See you in the comments.