Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jim Weiss's avatar

I would add "1a. Make sure the writer is really a writer." Across the spectrum, we keep seeing the same tells that an article was generated by AI. The em dashes. The "Not X, but Y" statements. The arrows in place of bullets. The clever(-ish) headings. The staccato rhythms of the paragraph structures like the ones I just wrote on purpose to make this point.

I posted a 7,300-word guide on my LinkedIn page the other day that I created initially with AI, simply because I've spent my adult life in a field that doesn't excite me (a lament for another time). By the time I was done reality checking and smoothing out the composition structure to approximate my actual voice, I realized I could've just done the bloody thing myself and finished in half the time. I doubt, though, that journalists who are turning to AI to free up their afternoons to scroll social media feeds are taking the time to make those revisions, leaving us to read one article after another that looks like it came from the same author. Irritating at the surface level, but more concerning when we're left to wonder just how accurate the story is.

Darrell's avatar

Hundreds of families in Kansas have one less thing to worry about, thanks to an anonymous philanthropist who donated $15,432 to clear outstanding lunch debts for about 450 students in Winfield Unified School District 465. “This generous gift directly supports our families and ensures that students can focus on learning without the burden of meal debt,” said superintendent Tricia Reiser. “We are incredibly grateful.”

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?