Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Swami's avatar

I side with the people engaging in voluntary commerce. Obviously as this becomes more common, which I hope is soon, there will need to be reasonable rules of the road. But it is one thing to make people move aside for robots and another entirely to intentionally block them.

Bruno's avatar

This doesn't seem like a binary choice. As described in the newsletter I would say that the woman was actively engaging as an obstruction. She went out of her own way to be in the way of what someone else is paying for. That is not the same as robots running people over, pushing people aside. Apparently the robot waited - maybe honked or flashed lights, but waited without harming her.

Take into account that the loss of delivery jobs creates new job opportunities. Someone engineered and designed that robot. Someone gets paid to maintain that robot (hardware). Someone will likely get paid to write/run software updates on that robot. Politicians and media folk get to debate and engender anger at the robots.

John Henry was replace by the steam engine - anyone here wish they could be digging holes in mountains with a pick and shovel?

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?